机构地区:[1]广西医科大学第四附属医院妇产科,柳州545005 [2]广西科技大学附属妇产医院,儿童医院院办,柳州545001 [3]广西科技大学第一附属医院妇产科,柳州545002 [4]广西科技大学第二附属医院妇产科,柳州545005 [5]柳州市中医院妇科,柳州545001
出 处:《肿瘤防治研究》2016年第3期221-225,共5页Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment
基 金:广西科学研究与技术开发计划项目(桂科攻0993003A-11);柳州市应用技术研究与开发计划课题(2009021510)
摘 要:目的评价保守性手术在卵巢恶性生殖细胞肿瘤(malignant ovarian germ cell tumor,MOGCT)患者治疗中的价值,为MOGCT患者选择合理的治疗模式提供科学依据。方法采用多中心、前瞻性对照临床试验方法,将MOGCT患者分为保守性手术组33例和广泛性手术组36例,从卫生经济学、手术安全性、月经、生育情况及疗效指标等多方面对两种治疗模式进行评价。结果 (1)卫生经济学指标:保守性手术组、广泛性手术组患者的平均初次住院时间分别为16.27、19.91天,平均初次住院费用分别为16 603.11、24 701.58元,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。(2)手术安全性:保守性手术组患者的平均手术时间、平均术中出血量、平均肠道恢复时间均明显短于广泛性手术组患者(P<0.05);两组间患者平均拔尿管时间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);手术并发症发生率分别为12.12%(4/33)、47.22%(17/36),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。(3)保守性手术组、广泛性手术组患者治疗结束后月经规律比率、妊娠率差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。(4)疗效指标:保守性手术组患者3、5年累积生存率分别为94%、87%,广泛手术组患者均为94%;保守手术组患者3、5年累积无进展生存率均为92%,广泛手术组患者均为97%,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论保守性手术在缩小手术范围、减少手术创伤、提高MOGCT患者生存质量同时,不影响MOGCT患者的预后。Objective To evaluate the therapeutic value of conservative surgery for malignant ovarian germ cell tumor(MOGCT), to provide scientifi c evidence for choosing reasonable treatment model on MOGCT patients. Methods We conducted a multi-center, prospective clinical trial. Patients with MOGCT were allocated into conservative surgery group(n=33) and extensive surgery group(n=36). We evaluated the two treatment models by the outcomes of health economics, surgical safety, regular menstruation rate, pregnancy and effectiveness. Results(1) Health economics: the average initial hospital stays of the conservative surgery group and extensive surgery group were 16.27 and 19.91 d, respectively; the average initial hospital costs were 16 603.11 and 24 701.58 RMB, respectively(P〈0.05).(2) Surgical safety: there were statistical differences between the conservative surgery group and extensive surgery group in the average time of operation, the average recovery time of intestinal tract(P〉0.05); there was no signifi cant difference between groups in the average time of pulling out the urine tube(P〈0.05); the rates of operative complications were 12.12%(4/33) and 47.22%(17/36) respectively(P〈0.05).(3) There were no signifi cant differences between the conservative surgery group and extensive surgery group in the rate of regular menstruation and the pregnancy rates after treatment(P〉0.05).(4) Effectiveness: the 3- and 5-year accumulate survival rates of the conservative surgery group were 94% and 87%, while those of the extensive surgery group were both 94%; the 3- and 5-year accumulate progressive-free survival rates of the conservative surgery group were both 92%, while those of the extensive surgery group were both 97%(P〉0.05). Conclusion Conservative surgery could reduce the scope of surgery and operative wound, and improve the quality of life without affecting the prognosis of MOGCT patients.
关 键 词:卵巢恶性生殖细胞肿瘤 保守性手术 治疗模式 前瞻性临床研究
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...