虚假诉讼罪:概念界定与学理分析  

The Crime of False Litigation: Conceptual Definition and Academic Analysis

作　　者：王志祥[1] 刘婷[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京师范大学刑事法律科学研究院,北京100875

出　　处：《南阳师范学院学报》2016年第1期1-7,共7页Journal of Nanyang Normal University

基　　金：教育部"新世纪优秀人才支持计划"资助项目(NCET-13-0062);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目"风险社会视野下的刑法修改宏观问题研究"(2012WZD11)

摘　　要：虚假诉讼是指行为人以捏造事实、伪造证据、虚构法律关系等方式,向法院提起诉讼,促使法院作出错误的判决或裁定,从而获取非法利益的行为。虚假诉讼系当事人滥用诉权的表现,其妨害了司法机关的正常诉讼活动,破坏了司法公正和司法权威。无论使用"诉讼诈骗""诉讼欺诈"还是"恶意诉讼"来表述虚假诉讼行为,都是不恰当的。从应然的角度看,虚假诉讼罪存在的范围不应当仅限于民事诉讼、行政诉讼,还应当包括仲裁程序。虚假诉讼的实行行为与犯罪结果之间具有时间和空间上的间隔。从这个意义上讲,虚假诉讼罪属于结果犯。《刑法修正案(九)》针对侵财类虚假诉讼罪想象竞合犯的定罪问题以及司法工作人员构成共犯等问题进行了特别规定。False litigation refers to circumstances in which a person files a litigation case to the court by fabricating facts,evidences or legal relationships,to mislead the judges to make wrong judgments and thereby obtain unlawful interests. False litigation is a kind of abuse of litigation,which hinders the normal litigation activities of judicial organs,and contaminates judicial justice and authority. The phrases such as ＂litigation swindling＂,＂litigation fraud＂,＂malicious litigation＂,et cetera,fall short of covering all the forms of false litigation. From the actual point of view,the existence scope of false litigation should not be limited to civil litigation and administrative litigation,and it should also exist in the arbitration procedures. There is an interval of time and scope between the perpetrating act and consequence,and in this sense,the crime of false litigation is consequential offense. Amendment（ IX） to the Criminal Law has specially stipulated the conviction of imaginative concurrent offense of false litigation concerning property violation as well as the issue of accomplice concerning judicial personnel.

关 键 词：虚假诉讼 客观方面 犯罪形态 竞合犯 共犯 

分 类 号：D925[政治法律—诉讼法学]