忽略的维度:詹姆斯·凯瑞的新闻历史观及其批判  

The Neglected Dimension:James Carey's Idea of Journalism History and its Criticism

作　　者：方晨[1] 李金泳[2] 蔡博方 

机构地区：[1]华中科技大学新闻与信息传播学院 [2]暨南大学新闻与传播学院 [3]台北医学大学医学人文研究所

出　　处：《国际新闻界》2016年第2期131-149,共19页Chinese Journal of Journalism & Communication

摘　　要：詹姆斯·凯瑞的新闻历史观是国内学界长期忽视的一个问题。本文通过对有关文献及其历史、社会背景的考察,梳理了凯瑞新闻史观的脉络。他的新闻史观立足于解决新闻史在新闻教育中日益边缘化的问题,深受新社会史、新文化史的影响,借鉴了人类学的研究方法,试图建构起新的新闻文化史。面对质疑和批评,凯瑞又提出用新闻实践史代替新闻文化史,进一步强调人在新闻实践中的主体性和新闻史的文化性。但是,他的视角是宏观的,研究方法却是微观的;目标在于革新传统新闻史的弊病,但是却又不展开意识形态的批判,从而陷入了意识形态与乌托邦的困境中。Although James Carey＇s idea of journalism history has been neglected for a long time in Chinese scholarship, this paper attempts to contextualize Carey＇s proposals in journalism history with his crucial texts and the historical and social backgrounds. In order to resolve the problem that journalism history is alienated from journalism education, Carey first constructed a new idea of cultural journalism history, not only influenced by the scholarship of new social history and new cultural history, but also absorbing the research methods of anthropology. Moreover,when facing the doubt and challenge, he then replaced cultural journalism history with practice journalism history, emphasizing human＇s subjectivity in journalism practice and cultural essence in journalism history. However, Carey＇s ideas in journalism history have two internal contradictions： on the one hand, his viewpoint is macro yet his research method is micro; on the other hand, his task focuses on resolving the problem in traditional journalism history, but his criticism could not be developed as an ideological critique, trapped in the dilemma between ideology and utopian.

关 键 词：凯瑞 新闻史观 新闻文化史 新闻实践史 

分 类 号：G210[文化科学—新闻学]