检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《软科学》2016年第3期130-135,共6页Soft Science
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(70871125;70902019);教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(10YJC630183)
摘 要:用博弈论建立单渠道和双渠道供应链决策模型,得到Bertrand均衡的制造商和零售商最优利润及消费者福利。研究发现:无论制造商生产成本如何,当零售商对制造商持股比例较小时,直销渠道增加制造商利润但侵蚀零售商利润;当零售商持股比例适中时,直销渠道实现了零售商和制造商双赢;当零售商持股比例较大时,制造商不开通直销渠道。但在双渠道中,若生产成本为线性,制造商降低批发价格;若生产成本为非线性,当零售商持股比例较小时,制造商提高批发价格;当零售商持股比例较大时,制造商降低批发价格。此外直销渠道总是增加消费者福利。Based on a supply chain consisting of a retailer and a supplier,this paper analyzes the supplier encroachment with retailer vertical sharing for supplier. Result showes that,if the proportion of the retailer for supplier was small,the retailer suffered,namely the "win-lose"outcomes; the retailer could benefit from encroachment when the retailer holds moderate shares for supplier,namely the"win-win"outcomes. However,if the retailer held more shares for supplier,the supplier did not launch the direct channel. What was the different,if the cost of supplier was linear,the supplier lowered wholesale price; the supplier raised wholesale price when the supplier showed diseconomy and the retailer holds less shares; the supplier lowered wholesale price when the supplier showed diseconomy but the retailer held more shares. In addition,consumers always benefit only if the supplier launched the direct channel.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222