检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郭靖[1] 王潇宇[1] 李学盛 孙海阳[2] 刘琳[1] 李鸿波[1]
机构地区:[1]解放军总医院口腔修复科,北京100853 [2]太原理工大学,山西太原030024
出 处:《南方医科大学学报》2016年第2期200-204,共5页Journal of Southern Medical University
基 金:国家自然科学基金(3081307);北京市科技计划项目(2010B078;Z141100002114031)~~
摘 要:目的采用三维有限元方法,研究髓腔固位冠修复下颌第一前磨牙牙体缺损时,不同边缘设计对牙体组织和修复体所受应力的影响。方法建立4种边缘设计形式(平面对接式边缘、直角肩台、135°肩台、凹面形边缘)的下颌第一前磨牙髓腔固位冠修复模型。加载点为牙齿长轴与牙合面交点,方向为与牙齿长轴平行、与牙齿长轴成45°,力量大小为100N。计算分析4种边缘设计形式的髓腔固位冠修复后牙体组织和修复体颈部的应力分布情况及最大Von Mises应力值。结果(1)沿牙齿长轴方向加载,应力集中出现在修复体和牙齿颈部的舌侧边缘,平面对接式边缘和直角肩台的颈部应力分布要比135°肩台和凹面形边缘的应力分布均匀;(2)施加与牙齿长轴成45°的载荷,应力主要集中在颊侧边缘,平面对接式边缘较其他3种边缘形式的应力分布要更为均匀,牙齿和修复体的最大应力值均明显高于与牙齿长轴平行加载情况下的应力值;(3)无论施加与牙齿长轴平行还是与牙齿长轴成45°的载荷,平面对接式边缘的牙齿和修复体颈部的应力值均最小,修复体颈部的应力值要大于牙齿颈部的应力值;(4)平面对接式边缘牙釉质的应力水平高于牙本质。结论从基牙和修复体受力情况来讲,髓腔固位冠修复采用平面对接式边缘和直角肩台优于其他边缘设计。Objective To evaluate the effect of different designs of marginal preparation on stress distribution in the mandibular premolar restored with endocrown using three- dimensional finite element method. Methods Four models with different designs of marginal preparation, including the flat margin, 90° shoulder, 135° shoulder and chamfer shoulder, were established to imitate mandibular first premolar restored with endocrown. A load of 100 N was applied to the intersection of the long axis and the occlusal surface, either parallel or with an angle of 45° to the long axis of the tooth. The maximum values of Von Mises stress and the stress distribution around the cervical region of the abutment and the endocrown with different designs of marginal preparation were analyzed. Results The load parallel to the long axis of the tooth caused obvious stress concentration in the lingual portions of both the cervical region of the tooth tissue and the restoration. The stress distribution characteristics on the cervical region of the models with a flat margin and a 90° shoulder were more uniform than those in the models with a 135° shoulder and chamfer shoulder. Loading at 45° to the long axis caused stress concentration mainly on the buccal portion of the cervical region, and the model with a flat margin showed the most favorable stress distribution patterns with a greater maximum Von Mises stress under this circumstance than that with a parallel loading. Irrespective of the loading direction, the stress value was the lowest in the flat margin model, where the stress value in the cervical region of the endocrown was greater than that in the counterpart of the tooth tissue. The stress level on the enamel was higher than that on the dentin nearby in the flat margin model. Conclusion From the stress distribution point of view, endocrowns with flat margin followed by a 90° shoulder are recommended.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15