检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《天津大学学报(社会科学版)》2016年第1期17-21,共5页Journal of Tianjin University:Social Sciences
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(71271152)
摘 要:保兑仓融资在改善供应链资金流方面发挥了重要作用,但在市场需求不确定且受到零售商销售努力水平影响的情况下,制造商对未销货物承诺全额回购的传统保兑仓模式难以协调。该研究目的就是探究这一问题的本质原因,并提出解决方案。采用制造商和零售商的供应链构建了模型,分析了传统保兑仓模式下的供应链协调性,提出了风险互换型保兑仓模式,并验证了这种模式下的供应链的协调性。结果表明,传统保兑仓模式不能协调供应链,其原因就是期望边际收益、边际成本在供应链成员间的分配不合理,而风险互换型保兑仓可以协调供应链之间的关系。Confirming Warehouse Financing (CWF) has shown great benefit in improving supply chain efficiency in cash flow. However, when the customer demand is uncertain and affected by the retailer' s sales effort, CWF, typically requiring a 100% buyback, fails to coordinate the supply chain. To understand the root cause of supply chain inefficiency and propose a solution, a Manufacturer-Retailer supply chain model is established, and the chain efficiency under traditional CWF is examined. Then a risk-swap CWF is raised and the supply chain efficiency under it is examined. The result shows that traditional CWF cannot coordinate the supply chain because of irrational allocation of expected marginal revenue and expected marginal cost among supply chain partners, and that the raised risk-swap CWF can coordinate the supply chain.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249