检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李永航
出 处:《广西政法管理干部学院学报》2016年第1期58-65,89,共9页Journal of Guangxi Administrative Cadre Institute of Politics and Law
基 金:重庆市人民检察院2014年度重大课题"刑事错案防止;纠正;责任追究机制研究"阶段性研究成果;项目编号:CQJCY2014A03
摘 要:我国审查逮捕环节非法证据排除规则自确立以来,基本上能够有序运行,相当一部分非法证据被成功排除,对于维护程序正义和防范刑事错案起到了积极的作用。但是,该规则在实施中仍然存在一些问题,如部分检察人员的中立性有待加强、证明责任不明确、审查方式职权化、操作规则粗疏模糊、配套措施不完善等。对此,应当强化检察官的客观公正义务,明确证明责任,探索听证式审查方式,细化操作规则,建立健全配套措施。In the past two years, the exclusionary rules of illegally obtained evidence at arrest reviewed stage run orderly in china. Some illegal evidence has been excluded, which has played a positive role in maintaining procedural justice and guiding against misjudged criminal cases. But there are still exist some problems in the operation of the illegal evidence exclusion, such as some prosecutors can not remain neutral, the burden of proof is not definite, the administrative review way, the fuzzy operation rules, imperfect supporting measures. Therefore, we should strengthen the objective obligation of prosecutors, definite the burden of proof, explore the hearing review way, detailed the operation rules, establish and improve the supporting measures.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.90