检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]第四军医大学口腔医学院口腔解剖生理学教研室及颞下颌关节门诊,陕西西安710032 [2]空军工程大学防空反导学院控测系统教研室,陕西西安710051
出 处:《西北医学教育》2016年第2期180-182,共3页Northwest Medical Education
摘 要:通过分析当前我国内高校中教学评价的现状,对传统教学评价中评价主体较少,评价方式不能与时更新,评价目的被异化等问题进行探讨,提出院校应当树立正确的评价导向,营造良好的教学评价氛围,把教学评价建立在广泛参与的基础之上,根据不同的评价主体设计评价指标,将教员、学员作为教学评价对象的重点,依据不同科目设置科学、合理、有效的评价指标体系。为解决传统教学评价耗时、耗材,效率低下等问题,提出利用现代化的科技手段制作基于评价主体的教学评价软件,快速有效地分析教学过程中影响教学效果的各项指标,从而制定针对性的措施,促进教学质量提升。Based on analyzing the current situation of teaching evaluation in domestic colleges and uni- versities, we discussed issues such as the fewer evaluation subjects, the out-of-date evaluation meth- ods, and the dissimilated evaluation target, etc. It was suggested that the colleges and universities should set up a right direction, and make a good atmosphere of teaching evaluation. The evaluation should base on the broad participation. Evaluation index should be set according to the evaluation sub- ject. The teachers and students are very important if we want to design a scientific, reasonable and el- fective evaluation system according to different courses. To overcome the problems of traditional eval- uation, the writer proposes to use the modern scientific software, which can analysis every index quickly and effectively in order to make the targeted measures and promote the teaching quality.
分 类 号:G642.0[文化科学—高等教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28