论宅基地“长期使用”权  

Long-Term Use Right of Rural Housing Land

作　　者：孙建伟[1] 

机构地区：[1]上海杉达学院法学系,上海市201209

出　　处：《暨南学报（哲学社会科学版）》2016年第3期58-64,130,共7页Jinan Journal(Philosophy and Social Sciences)

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学青年基金项目<城乡统筹与农村宅基地置换中本土化的制度资源研究>(批准号:12YJC820091);上海哲学社会科学规划课题<撤村撤队后剩余集体土地权属研究>(批准号:2014BFX004)

摘　　要：宅基地使用权"长期使用"在物权法以及相关法律上没有明确。如何理解"长期使用"权,面临理论上分歧和实践上的争议。准确确定宅基地使用权的期限设定,根据相关学理和实践探索:宅基地使用权"长期使用"在不同的法律关系应具有不同的内涵。在处理集体与成员权的关系上,应持新型"总有"说,长期使用即意味着永久使用。在宅基地使用权转让给非集体成员权使用、收益等法律关系上,应持类所有权说,在宅基地使用权上可以设置地上权,应设定具体的期限。对此,可以从宅基地使用权性质、功能、该制度存在的困境以及其改革方向等方面加以证成。Today the long-term use right of housing land use right in the property law and related legal is still not clearly. How to understand 'the longterm use rights ',there're many face to the disputes on the differences in theory and practice.Accurately, determine the deadline of housing land use right,according to the related theory and practice need to explore: 'long-term use right of housing land in different legal relationships should have different connotations. In dealing with the relations how to collective rights to the members,should hold new theory of co-ownership should be necessary,used for a long time means that the permanent use. The legal relationship in the transfer of land use right from the member of the collective to other should hold the similar theory of ownership. It should set the superficies on the rights could be sited,and shohld to set specific deadlines. In this case,it can be proved from the aspects of the nature,function,the system of housing land use right dilemma and to pass into the direction of reform,etc.

关 键 词：宅基地使用权 总有 用益物权 长期使用权 

分 类 号：D9[政治法律—法学]