检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:管明秀 周云丽[1] 王萌[1] 仝颖娜 刘晓彬[1]
机构地区:[1]天津医科大学肿瘤医院检验科,国家肿瘤临床医学研究中心,天津市"肿瘤防治"重点实验室,天津300060 [2]天津市宝坻区人民医院检验科,天津医科大学宝坻临床学院,天津301800
出 处:《天津医科大学学报》2016年第2期140-143,共4页Journal of Tianjin Medical University
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(81201653);天津市卫生局科技基金资助项目(2011KZ77)
摘 要:目的:比较TuM2-PK,tPSA,fPSA/t PSA和PSAD在PSA灰区对前列腺癌的诊断价值。方法:选取tPSA在4~10 ng/mL的前列腺癌(PCa)、良性前列腺增生(BPH)及前列腺炎老年患者共252例,测其血中TuM2-PK,tPSA和fPSA,计算fPSA/tPSA比值;经直肠B超测前列腺体积,计算tPSA与前列腺体积之比,得到PSAD。用SPSS19.0分析TuM2-PK,tPSA,fPSA/tPSA和PSAD在PSA灰区对PCa的诊断价值。结果:PCa组的TuM2-PK,fPSA/tPSA和PSAD比前列腺炎老年组及BPH组均有显著变化(P〈0.05);3组间的tPSA没有显著差异(P〉0.05)。TuM2-PK AUC(0.948)〉PSAD AUC(0.801)〉fPSA/tPSA AUC(0.610)〉tPSA AUC(0.499)。当TuM2-PK、tPSA、fPSA/tPSA和PSAD最佳临界值分别取24.30 U/mL、6.60 ng/mL、0.16和0.15 ng/(mL·cm3)时,诊断PCa的敏感性和特异性分别为88.9%和92.1%,72.2%和44.9%,80.5%和60.2%,83.3%和71.8%。结论:在PSA灰区,TuM2-PK、fPSA/tPSA、PSAD均能提高PCa诊断的敏感性和特异性,且TuM2-PK比fPSA/tPSA和PSAD对于PCa的诊断具有更高的准确性。Objective: To explore diagnostic significance of TuM2-PK, tPSA, fPSA/tPSA and PSAD for prostate cancer in PSA gray area.Methods: Two hundred and fifty-two cases with prostatic cancer(PCa), benign prostatic hyperplasia(BPH) and prostatitis whose tPSA levels were between 4 ng/mL and 10 ng/mL were chosen. Plasmatic TuM2-PK and serum fPSA, tPSA were examined. Prostate volume was determined by transrectal ultrasound. PSAD and fPSA/tPSA were calculated. The diagnostic significance of TuM2-PK, tPSA, fPSA/tPSA and PSAD for PCa in PSA gray area were analyzed using SPSS19.0. Results: Compared with BPH group and elderly prostatitis group,TuM2-PK, fPSA/tPSA and PSAD in PCa group were significantly changed(P〈0.05); There was no significant difference in t PSA among the three groups. The AUC of these indexes in descending order was TuM2-PK, PSAD, fPSA/tPSA, and tPSA. While the cutoffs of TuM2-PK,tPSA, fPSA/tPSA and PSAD were 24.30 U/mL, 6.60 ng/mL, 0.16 and 0.15 ng/(mL·cm3), the sensitivity and specificity of diagnosed PCa were 88.9% and 92.1%,72.2% and 44.9%,80.5% and 60.2%,83.3% and 71.8%, respectively. Conclusion: TuM2-PK, fPSA/tPSA and PSAD can increase sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of PCa in PSA gray area. And compared with fPSA/tPSA and PSAD, TuM2-PK is more accurate in diagnosing PCa.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.112