受贿案非法言词证据排除的庭审实效研究  

The Research on Trial Effect of Exclusionary Rules of Illegally Obtained Verbal Evidence in Bribery Cases

作　　者：黄健[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学法学院,北京100872

出　　处：《江南社会学院学报》2015年第4期73-80,共8页Journal of Jiangnan Social University

摘　　要：就证据种类而言,非法言词证据适用绝对排除规则;就排除阶段而言,我国新的《刑事诉讼法》对审判阶段排除非法证据的程序规定最为详细。受贿证据以被告人供述、行贿人证言这两种言词证据为主,且辩方更倾向于在审判阶段申请排除非法证据。因此,通过受贿案非法言词证据在审判阶段排除的实证研究,可以分析我国最明确、详细的非法证据排除规则及程序设计的运行实效,并发现实践中的规律与缺陷。现阶段,即使是最为详尽的排除规则,在实际运用中仍缺乏指导性。通过规范化程序设计可以为非法证据排除提供指引并限制裁判机关的自由裁量,矫正缺陷。For the kinds of evidence,illegally obtained verbal evidence should be absolutely expelled.For stages,the exclusion procedure in trail stage is legislated in the most detailed way in Criminal Procedure Law.The confession and exculpation of the defendant and testimony of the briber are the primary evidences in bribery cases.What is more,the defense tends to apply for exclusion procedure at the trial stages.So an empirical study on the exclusionary rules of illegally obtained verbal evidence in bribery cases at trial stage will analyze the implementations of the most obvious exclusion rules in our country and find out the defects in them.At the present stage,even the most elaborate exclusion rules fail to guide sometimes.In order to correct the defect,procedure should be standardized to guide and limit the discretion of judicial organs.

关 键 词：受贿案 非法言词证据排除 缺陷 成因 规范化 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]