检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周娅[1] 陈宇轩[2,3] 邹瑞[4] 周玮[2,3] 查同刚[2,3]
机构地区:[1]北京林业大学林学院,北京100083 [2]北京林业大学水土保持学院,北京100083 [3]北京林业大学北京市水土保持工程技术研究中心,北京100083 [4]安徽省水文局,安徽合肥230022
出 处:《西南林业大学学报(自然科学)》2016年第2期25-30,共6页Journal of Southwest Forestry University:Natural Sciences
基 金:林业公益性专项项目(201204102)资助;国际科技合作专项项目(2012DFA60830)资助
摘 要:为研究林分密度对土壤团聚体稳定性的影响,以北京市八达岭林场3种不同密度(低密度500~800株/hm2,中密度1 000~1 200株/hm2,高密度1 400~1 600株/hm2)油松人工林为研究对象,通过野外调查采样和室内测定,系统分析了各林分分形维数、不同粒级团聚体保存率和团聚体稳定性指数。结果表明:林分密度显著影响土壤团聚体分形维数,3种不同密度油松人工林土壤团聚体分形维数(干筛)介于2.62~2.76,低密度林地分形维数最小,高密度林地分形维数最大;土壤水稳性团聚体分形维数(湿筛)与林分密度呈正相关,变化范围是2.64-2.79;低密度林分0~10cm土层分形维数最小,高密度林分20~30 cm土层分形维数最大;各粒级团聚体保存率均大于0.5,其中0.5~0.25 mm粒级团聚体保存率最大,水稳性最强,1~0.5 mm粒级团聚体保存率最小,水稳性最弱;团聚体稳定性指数介于3.62~4.55,林分密度增加团聚体稳定性指数逐渐减小。低密度林分土壤团聚体稳定性更好,更有利于水土保持,建议将该区域油松人工林密度控制在500~800株/hm2。To identify" the effect of stand density on soil structure, fraetal dimension, soil aggregate saving probability and aggregate stability index were analyzed based on field survey and sampling in three Pinus tabulifor- mis plantation with stand density of 500 - 800 trees/ hm2 ( I^w density, LD) , 1 000 - 1 200 trees/ hm2 ( Middle density, MD) and l 400 - 1 600 trees/hm2 (High density, HD) respectively in Badaling area of Beijing. The re- suits showed that stand density had a significant influence on fractal dimension of soil aggregate (dry sieving) , it was ranged from 2.62 to 2.76 with the largest in the HD Pinus tabuliformis plantations and the smallest in the LD plantations. The fractal dimension of water stable aggregate (wet sieving) was between 2.64 and 2.79 and positive- ly correlated with stand density. The smallest fractal dimension was found at the 0 - 10 cm layer in LD plantation and the largest one was found at the 20 - 30 em depth in HD plantation. All the aggregate saving probability of the forest soil was 〉 0.5, the soil aggregate of 0. 5 -0.25 mm had the highest stability for the largest saving probability and soil aggregate of 1 -0. 5 mm was the most unstable as it was the smallest saving probability. The aggregate sta- bility index ranged from 3.62 to 4.55, and decreased with the increasing of stand density. In general, Soil aggre- gate in the LD Pinus tabuliformis plantation was the most stable and was good for soil and water conservation. Therefore, we suggested stand density of 500 - 800 trees/hm2 of the Pinus tabuliformis plantation in the research ar- ea for improving soil aggregate structure.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117