检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孙洁[1] 邓立兰 凌燕[1] 魏永亮[1] 史聪翀[2]
机构地区:[1]广西梧州市红十字会医院口腔科,广西梧州543002 [2]昆明医科大学附属口腔医院口腔科,云南昆明650031
出 处:《现代生物医学进展》2016年第9期1742-1744,共3页Progress in Modern Biomedicine
基 金:广西科学技术厅攻关项目(桂科攻114003B-72)
摘 要:目的:研究微型种植体支抗治疗青少年口腔正畸的疗效及安全性。方法:选择2013年5月-2015年5月在我院接受治疗的80例青少年口腔正畸患者,随机分为试验组和对照组。试验组给予微型种植体支抗治疗,对照组给予传统正畸治疗。观察并比较两组患者的临床疗效、不良反应及头影测量结果。结果:试验组患者的上、中切牙倾角差、上中切牙凸距差、磨牙移位的改善情况均明显高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);与治疗前比较,两组患者治疗后U1-L1、U1-SN、L1-MP、U1-NA、L1-NB、SNA、SNB及ANB差值均有统计学意义(P<0.05);试验组U1-L1、SNB显著大于对照组,其他指标均显著小于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);试验组患者不良反应的发生率明显低于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:与传统支抗方法相比,微型种植体支抗用于青少年口腔正畸治疗具有操作简便、疗效显著、安全性较高等优点,适合在临床推广使用。Objective: To analyze the efficacy and safety of mini-implant in the treatment of adolescent orthodontic, and explore its clinical applicability. Methods: 80 cases with adolescent orthodontic patients who were treated in our hospital from May 2009 to May2012 were selected, and randomly divided into the test group and the control group with 40 cases in each group. The patients in the test group treated with micro-implant anchorage orthodontic method, while the patients in the control group were treated with conventional orthodontic method. Then the clinical efficacy and the adverse reactions after treatment were observed and compared before and after the treatment. Results: The situation of upper central incisor inclination difference, the central incisors protruding distance difference and displaced teeth in the test group were significantly better than that of the control group(P〈0.05); The differences of U1-SN, L1-MP, U1-NA,L1-NB, SNB, SNA, U1-L1 and ANB in the test group were significantly higher than those of the control group, and the other indicators were significantly less than those of the control group, and the differences were statistically significant(P〈0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions in the test group was significantly lower than that of the control group, and the differences were statistically significant(P〈0.05).Conclusions: Compared with the traditional method of anchorage, the mini implant was a simple and efficacious method for orthodontics with high security.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:13.58.73.22