检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴琼[1] 杨丽铃[1] 张倩[1] 魏毅[1] 曾薇[1] 牟娇[1] 冯兵[1]
机构地区:[1]第三军医大学新桥医院肾内科,重庆400037
出 处:《第三军医大学学报》2016年第8期840-844,共5页Journal of Third Military Medical University
基 金:国家自然科学基金面上项目(81370820)~~
摘 要:目的探讨伴与不伴水肿的糖尿病肾病(diabetic nephropathy,DN)患者的临床与病理特征。方法将病理诊断明确的170例DN患者分成水肿型DN组(edema DN,E-DN)和非水肿型DN组(nonedema DN,NE-DN),比较两组患者的临床和病理特征及预后间的差异。结果与基线值比较,E-DN组肾脏病理改变重,糖化血红蛋白(Hb A1c)、血压(BP)、总胆固醇(TC)、24 h尿蛋白定量〉3.5 g的百分比等均显著高于NE-DN组(P〈0.05,P〈0.01),而e GFR和血浆白蛋白(ALB)、尿比重、尿渗透压等均显著低于NE-DN组(P〈0.05,P〈0.01)。随访2年,E-DN组e GFR下降速率均显著大于NEDN组(P〈0.05),肾脏终点事件发生率、肾外并发症发病率也显著高于NE-DN组(P〈0.05)。生存分析显示E-DN组预后差(χ^2=17.460,P〈0.01)。危险因素分析发现肾活检时ALB(RR=0.938,P=0.004)、e GFR(RR=0.985,P〈0.01)、肾脏间质病变(RR=1.236,P=0.012)、TC(RR=1.192,P=0.015)、水肿(RR=6.412,P〈0.01)是DN肾脏死亡的独立危险因素。结论伴有水肿的DN患者较不伴有水肿的DN患者血糖控制较差、ALB低、脂质代谢紊乱、肾脏间质病变重、肾脏中位生存时间短,水肿为影响肾脏死亡的独立危险因素。Objective To investigate the clinical and pathological characteristics of diabetic nephropathy( DN) patients with edema or not. Methods Totally 170 patients with type 2 diabetic nephropathy,which were diagnosed by renal biopsy,were divided into groups: edema DN( E-DN) and nonedema DN( NE-DN) group. The clinical and pathological features and prognosis were compared between the 2 groups. Results Compared with the baseline values,the renal pathological changes were more serious in group E-DN. The integral of the renal interstitial lesions was significantly larger than that of the NE-DN group( P〈0. 05). And glycosylated hemoglobin( Hb A1c),blood pressure( BP),total cholesterol( TC),percentage of 24 h urinary protein leakage over 3. 5 g were significantly higher than those in group NE-DN( P〈0. 05,P〈0. 01). E-DN group of e GFR and plasma albumin( ALB) were significantly lower than the NE-DN group. In the 2 years' follow-up,E-DN group of patients had e GFR decreased significantly greater than the NE-DN group( P〈0. 05,P〈0. 01). The incidence of renal end events was also significantly higher than that of the latter( P〈0. 05). Survival analysis showed that the prognosis of group E-DN was poor( Chi square = 17. 460,P〈0. 01). Risk factor analysis showed that ALB( RR = 0. 938,P = 0. 004),e GFR( RR =0. 985,P〈0. 01),interstitial lesion of the kidney( RR = 1. 236,P = 0. 012),TC( RR = 1. 192,P =0. 015),and edema( RR = 6. 412,P〈0. 01) were independent risk factors of death in DN kidney.Conclusion When compared with NE-DN group,the E-DN group has a poor blood glucose control,low serum albumin,lipid metabolism disorder,and renal interstitial lesions,and the renal median survival time is short. Edema was an independent risk factor for renal death.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.168