检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨甜[1]
机构地区:[1]郑州大学附属洛阳中心医院消化内科,471000
出 处:《中国继续医学教育》2016年第8期174-175,共2页China Continuing Medical Education
摘 要:目的观察比较奥曲肽、垂体后叶素在肝硬化消化道出血临床治疗中的效果。方法选取2015年1月~2015年12月于我院接受治疗的90例肝硬化上消化道出血患者,根据治疗方式分为两组,各45例。奥曲肽组使用奥曲肽治疗,垂体后叶素组使用垂体后叶素治疗,比较两组疗效和不良反应。结果奥曲肽组总有效率和不良反应分别为93.33%、8.89%,垂体后叶素组分别为71.11%、33.33%,奥曲肽组临床疗效高于垂体后叶素组,不良反应少于垂体后叶素组,差异有统计学意义,P〈0.05。结论肝硬化上消化道出血使用奥曲肽治疗的效果较使用垂体后叶素佳,安全性更优。Objective To compare the effect of treating the cirrhosis upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage of applying octreotide and vasopress. Methods Selected 90 cases who suffer gastrointestinal bleeding in our hospital from January to December 2015,then divide them into two groups according to treatment ways. Each group had 45 patients. One group used the way of octreotide to treat, the other group used the way of pituitrin, then we can compare the efficacy and adverse reactions. Results The total efficiency and adverse reaction rates of octreotide group were 93.33%, 8.89%,but the vasopressin group were 71.11%, 33.33%, the clinical efficacy of the former was higher than the latter group, and the side effects was fewer than the latter, the difference had statistical significance, P0.05. Conclusion The treatment effect of the use of octreotide is better than the vasopressin in the treatment of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in cirrhosis and the security.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15