检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]广东省农垦中心医院医学影像科,广东湛江524000
出 处:《现代医用影像学》2016年第1期43-45,共3页Modern Medical Imageology
摘 要:目的:分析CT鉴别诊断胆总管壶腹区恶性肿瘤性病变的临床价值。材料与方法:选2008年12月到2015年6月我院收治疑似胆总管壶腹区恶性肿瘤患者60例,随机进行分组,其中对照组为30例,研究组为30例,给予对照组一般诊断方法,给予研究组CT鉴别诊断方法,与病理学分析对比后,分析两组患者的诊断准确率。结果:给予两种不同的诊断方法后,对照组的诊断准确率为80%,研究组的诊断准确率为93.3%,研究组的诊断准确率(93.3%)明显高于对照组(80%),组间数据对比差异明显,(P<0.05)具有统计学意义。结论:对疑似胆总管壶腹区恶性肿瘤患者采用CT鉴别诊断方法,诊断准确率高,可为临床下一步治疗提供正确指导。Purpose: to analyze CT differential diagnosis of common bile duct ampulla area the clinical value of malignant tumor lesions. Materials and Methods: selected in December 2008 to June 2015 our hospital suspected bile duct ampulla area of 60 patients with malignant tumor,random grouping,among them the control group of 30 cases,the team of 30 cases,control group general diagnosis method,give the team CT differential diagnosis method,compared with pathology analysis,analysis of two groups of patients diagnosis accuracy. Results: after giving two different diagnosis methods,the control of the diagnostic accuracy rate was 80%,the team of diagnostic accuracy was 93. 3%,the team of diagnostic accuracy( 93. 3%) is significantly higher than the control group( 80%),the data contrast differences between group obviously( P〈0. 05),with statistical significance. Conclusion: in patients with suspected bile duct ampulla area of malignant tumor by CT differential diagnosis method,the diagnosis accuracy is high,can provide correct guidance for clinical treatment of next.
关 键 词:CT 鉴别诊断 胆总管壶腹区恶性肿瘤性病变 临床价值
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.171