20世纪90年代以来我国“关键词批评”发展透视  

A Study on the Development of “Keywords Criticism” in China Since 1990s

作　　者：黄擎[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]浙江大学人文学院中文系 [2]复旦大学

出　　处：《浙江社会科学》2016年第4期104-111,2+158-159,共8页Zhejiang Social Sciences

基　　金：国家社科基金青年项目"‘关键词批评’的理论范式及其在中国的批评实践研究"(11CZW019);教育部人文社科青年项目"‘关键词批评’研究"(10YJC751035);浙江省之江青年人才资助项目"‘关键词批评’的理论范式及其在中国的批评实践研究"(G20)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：雷蒙·威廉斯开创的"关键词批评"建构了一种新的理论范式,以核心术语为考察重心,从历时和共时层面梳理并揭示词语背后的政治思想倾向与人文踪迹,具有独到的研究视角和开阔的理论视野。20世纪90年代以来,我国文学和文化研究领域的"关键词批评"在理论承传和批评实践层面显现出新的特点:一是不再聚焦于"关键词"的词源追溯,而是在学科发展及批评实践的流变中对其意义生衍进行考辨解析;二是涌现了一批具有新气象的论著,呈现出注重紧扣文学文本的批评实践趋向;三是伴随着编撰体例的突破,进一步削减辞书性,彰显表达个人观点与批评立场的文论性。'Keywords criticism', put forward by Raymond Williams, creates a brand new theoretical paradigm. It provides distinctive research perspective together withbroad theoretical horizon by focusing on the explanation of core terms and investigates from diachronic and synchronic perspectives to review the trend of political thoughts as well as traces of humanity. Since 1990 s, the theoretical inheritance and critical practice aspects of 'keywords criticism' in Chinese literature and culture research shows two characteristics:Firstly,'keywords criticism' no longer concentrates on the traces of a certain 'keyword', but investigates the derivation of its meaning with the development of disciplines and the change of critical practice. Secondly,publications with new perspectives spring up, which perceives the focus on the texts as the trend of critical practice. Thirdly, with the breakthrough of compilation system, the property of dictionary is declined, and the literariness is signified by expressing personal opinions and critical perspectives.

关 键 词：批评” 理论承传 批评实践 

分 类 号：I06[文学—文学理论]