检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王宇雄[1]
机构地区:[1]山西农业大学马克思主义学院
出 处:《中国农业大学学报(社会科学版)》2016年第2期57-64,共8页Journal of China Agricultural University;Social Sciences
摘 要:毛泽东和梁漱溟均把农民问题作为找寻国家出路过程中的基本问题。毛泽东服从中国革命发展的需要考量农民问题,梁漱溟基于中国社会基础的再造考量农民问题,最后的结果是毛泽东主张的方案取得了成功,而梁漱溟的乡村建设实验却没有什么成效。他们为解决农民问题而进行的努力,虽然结局不同,但他们对农民问题的认知中都内含了革命性和现代性两方面的因素。他们探索的思路和方案都有其内在的合理性,其中梁漱溟的探索尽管就确立建国基础而言是一种理想化的设计,但就其解决农民问题本身而言还是有价值的。今天我们仍然需要从他们的思路中汲取营养,以求有助于解决农民问题。Both Mao Zedong and Liang Shuming considered peasant issues as the basic problem helping the country finding a way out. Mao Zedong deah with the peasant issues in line with the requirement of the development of Chinese revolution, while Liang Shuming did it based on the rebuilt of China' s social foundation. In terms of results, Mao wined while Liang' s experiment did not make any substantive progress. Although the end was different, their ideas and practices contained the relevance of both revolutionariness and modernity. There is no doubt that plenty rationality involved in their methods and plans. For instance, Liang' s plan is idealized in terms of state foundation establishment, but has its due value in tackling the peasant issues. The author suggests even in nowadays, their ideas are valuable heritage to us in addressing the current farmer issues in the end of the paper.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3