必要共同犯罪概念及其功能问题研究——一个域外概念的中国化思考  

Study on the Concept and Function of Essential Joint Crime——A Chinese Characteristics Consideration of an Extraterritorial Concept

作　　者：熊亚文[1] 

机构地区：[1]厦门大学法学院,福建厦门361005

出　　处：《河南财经政法大学学报》2016年第3期72-80,共9页Journal of Henan University of Economics and Law

摘　　要：基于中外刑法犯罪论体系、共同犯罪理论及立法的差异,我国刑法必要共同犯罪概念与德、日刑法必要共犯概念存在本质区别,二者实际上是处于不同层次的两个不同概念。在我国刑法中,必要共同犯罪与任意共同犯罪的分类功能在于区别二者的法律适用方式:对于任意共同犯罪,应当结合刑法总则共犯规定定罪量刑;对于必要共同犯罪,则应当排除刑法总则共犯规定之适用,仅根据刑法分则的相应规定定罪量刑。如此分类功能蕴含着极为重要的刑法意义,它不仅可以用来划定二者所含具体犯罪类型,还能用来区分并指导必要共同犯罪的刑法分则立法,并严格限制必要共同犯罪立法的处罚范围。On the basis of the differences among Chinese and foreign crime on the system of criminal law, common crime theory and legislation, the concept of our criminal essential joint crime differentiates with Germany and Japan criminal law concepts. They are actually two various concepts in different levels. In the Criminal Code, if necessary, together with any common criminal offenses classification difference between the two lies in the way the law applies：common crimes should be sentenced by combining with the provisions of the Criminal Code General accomplice ; common crimes should be sentenced by excluding the provisions of the Penal General accomplice in accordance with the corresponding provisions of the criminal law. So classification of the Penal Code contains a very important sense, it can be used not only to delineate specific offenses contained in both types, but also to distinguish and guide the necessary common crime criminal law legislation, and strictly limit the need for joint crime legislation Punishment ranges.

关 键 词：必要共同犯罪 必要共犯 任意共同犯罪 

分 类 号：D924.1[政治法律—刑法学]