检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郎婧[1]
机构地区:[1]中国刑事警察学院法律教研部,辽宁沈阳110035
出 处:《辽宁警察学院学报》2016年第3期7-10,共4页Journal of Liaoning Police College
摘 要:2012年最新修改的《刑事诉讼法》确立了当事人和解的公诉案件诉讼程序,弥补了公诉案件刑事和解在立法层面上的空白。这一新型司法程序的出现弥补了传统刑事司法程序的不足,维护了被害人的合法权益,节约了诉讼成本,提高了诉讼效率,并且有助于恢复社会秩序和修复社会关系。但是,刑事和解程序本身还存在诸多不足有待于完善。文章以辩诉交易制度为视角对刑事和解程序进行进一步的补充与完善,通过学习和借鉴国外较为成熟的辩诉交易制度以提高我国刑事诉讼效率,缓解法院待审案件的积压,与刑事和解程序相互补充,协调适用。Adversary reconciliation of judicial proceedings in the case of public prosecution is established in the new Criminal Procedure Law in 2012, which covers the deficit of the criminal settlement in the public prosecution. The new judicial procedure which makes up for the deficiency of the traditional criminal proceedings, protects the legitimate right of aggrieved persons, saves the lawsuit cost, raises the litigation efficiency, and helps to repairing of social relation and harmony of society. However, there are some insufficiencies to cover. From the perspective of the plea bargaining system, this paper is to improve the judicial proceeding, by studying the plea bargaining to enhance the efficiency of proceedings and ease case pressure in order to be mutual complementation with criminal reconciliation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222