“简而有法”与“辞达而已”:对比鲜明的两种文法论范型  

“Pithy Style and Legitimate Compile”or“Fluent in Writing Skills”:Sharp Contrast Theories of Writing Technique

作　　者：陆德海[1] 

机构地区：[1]苏州科技学院人文学院,江苏苏州215009

出　　处：《中国文学研究》2016年第2期66-69,共4页Research of Chinese Literature

基　　金：江苏省高校哲学社会科学基金项目"宋代儒学发展与文章学进程"(2013SJB750016);国家社科基金项目"宋元文法论"(14BZW067)部分成果

摘　　要：欧阳修与苏轼虽然同为北宋诗文革新的领袖,交谊甚厚,但二人文章学思想并不相同。欧阳修"简而有法"说植根于其儒学思想,与其史家身份相符,是对经学命题的文章学转化;苏轼则对"辞达而已"进行了创造性的解读,赋予"辞达而已"以"随物赋形"、"以无为法"等新内涵,将文章写作导向纯艺术化。前者深受"立言不朽"观念影响,力求以文立制,文法上精益求精,后者则追求文章写作中物我两忘的自由境界以审美为旨归。因此,"简而有法"与"辞达而已"实为对比鲜明的两种文法论范型。As the leaders of the literature reformation in the North Song dynasty,there is a great difference between their essay＇s theory, though they kept a good friendship in all life. OU Yang-xiu＇s theory was known as ＂pithy style and legitimate compile＂,whichbased on his thoughts on Confucianism and in line with the historian,and it is also the transformationof the study of Confucian classics;SU Shi gave creativeinterpretation to the word of the ＂fluent in writing skills＂,which advocated by Confucius,he suggested that essays should be written in accordance with natural things＇ tendency and quoted the Buddhism method which called＂Asamskrta＂to establish his ＂fluent in writing skills＂theory,led the essays theory to the art for art＇s sake. So SU-Shi＇s theory onwriting technique and rules extricated from the control of Confucian classic and objected to OU Yang- xiu＇s ＂pithy style and legitimate compile＂theory.

关 键 词：欧阳修 苏轼 简而有法 辞达而已 

分 类 号：I206.2[文学—中国文学]