检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《森林工程》2016年第3期76-80,共5页Forest Engineering
基 金:国家科学自然基金项目(50278068)
摘 要:为了研究RC高墩的抗震性能和试验方法,通过对4根RC高墩模型进行了拟静力试验,观察到墩底附近在加载后期均出现剪切斜裂缝,随着保护层混凝土逐渐脱落,主筋在断裂前发生明显的屈曲现象。这些现象说明RC高墩的实际破坏形态、破坏机理与P-M-φ分析的前提假设是不一致的。试件的实测极限曲率值,比P-M-φ分析计算值,小约50%,本文结论是P-M-φ分析会严重高估RC高墩的曲率能力,偏于不安全。In order to study the seismic capacity and design method of RC tall column,the pseudo-static test was carried out on four RC tall column models. The shearing diagonal cracks were observed near the bottom of the pieces at the late phase of loading.With the fall of the protecting cement,the main reinforcement bucked prior to breaking. These appearances indicated that the actual failure pattern and mechanism of tall column were different from the presupposition of P- M- φ analysis. The actual curvature values of the pieces measured at their ultimate state were nearly 50% less than the theoretical value which was obtained from P- M- φ analysis. The main conclusion is that P- M- φ analysis is inapplicable to estimate the curvature capacity of tall RC column. The result would be seriously overestimated,which is probably unsafe for the bridge.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.217.160.127