检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《中国医学影像技术》2016年第5期753-756,共4页Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging Technology
摘 要:目的探讨MSCT诊断各级别急性阑尾炎的差异及与病理结果的一致性。方法回顾性分析本院临床疑诊急性阑尾炎并手术的患者166例,对所有患者均进行常规MSCT扫描及MPR,92例患者加做CPR,根据影像征象分为0~5级,分别计算MSCT诊断各级别急性阑尾炎的准确率,并计算总体敏感度、特异度、准确率及与病理诊断的一致性。结果 MSCT诊断0~5级急性阑尾炎的准确率分别为93.33%(14/15)、54.55%(6/11)、89.47%(34/38)、95.52%(64/67)、91.30%(21/23)、91.67%(11/12)。MSCT诊断急性阑尾炎的敏感度为96.68%(146/151),特异度为93.33%(14/15),准确率为96.38%(160/166);影像诊断与病理诊断具有较高的一致性(Kappa=0.82)。结论 MSCT诊断急性阑尾炎与病理有较高一致性,其中对3级阑尾炎诊断准确率最高。Objective To investigate the difference of MSCT in diagnosis of appendicitis levels and the consistency with the pathological results. Methods Totally 166 patients with clinical suspected diagnosis of appendicitis were enrolled. All patients underwent conventional MSCT and MPR, 92 cases were performed CPR. According to the imaging signs, the ap- pendicitis was divided into level 0 to 5, and accuracy was calculated at all levels. The overall sensitivity, specificity, accura- cy and consistency with pathology were also calculated. Results Diagnostic accuracy of 0 to 5 level appendicitis in MSCT were 93.33% (14/15), 54.55% (6/11), 89.47% (34/38), 95.52% (64/67), 91.30% (21/23), 91.67% (11/12). Overall sensitivity, specificity, accuracy were 96.68% (146/151), 93.33% (14/15), 96.38% (160/166). The image di- agnosis and pathology had high consistency (Kappa=0. 82). Conclusion MSCT in the diagnosis of appendicitis has high consistency with pathology, among them, the accuracy of diagnosis level 3 appendicitis is the highest.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.175