检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张小玲[1]
机构地区:[1]中国人民公安大学
出 处:《政法论坛》2016年第3期131-141,共11页Tribune of Political Science and Law
基 金:最高人民检察院检察理论研究重点课题"以审判为中心背景下的侦诉关系"(项目批准号:J2015B05)阶段性研究成果
摘 要:以审判为中心的诉讼制度改革要求在审前程序中加强侦诉合力,以增强追诉的有效性与合法性。在诸多改革方案中,以"侦诉一体化"改造我国审前侦诉关系之构想,不仅在法理上缺乏充足依据,而且域外实践亦证明其不可行。相比之下,在我国既有的警检分立基础上构建"检察引导侦查"机制不失为更加合理的选择。为此,我国应当以高阶位法律的形式为其提供法律依据,并在厘清其性质定位的基础上,明确其适用的案件范围、引导侦查的主体、时间和具体方式。The reform of the criminal procedure taking trial as the center requires the corporation between the public prosecutor and the police with the aim to enhance the effectiveness and legality of prosecution. Among the different projects of reform,the integration of the public prosecutor and the police not only has no solid foundation in theory,but also has been proved to be impractical in other countries. By contrast,the construction of the mechanic that the prosecutor gives guidance or advice to the police is more scientific and reasonable. Therefore,it should be established in the law. And we should make clear the categories of cases which it applies to,the sector of the procuratorate in charge,the stage and the ways that the prosecutor guides the police.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.177