检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]广东省妇幼保健院,广州510010
出 处:《中国卫生经济》2016年第5期81-83,共3页Chinese Health Economics
基 金:广东省自然科学基金项目(S2012010008269)
摘 要:目的:探讨妇婴疾病诊断相关组模型的分组效果和应用评价。方法:比较分析WI-DRGs模型的组内同质性和组间异质性。比较分析WI-DRGs、CN-DRGs、MS-DRGS和AR-DRGs的分组效果,比较三个独立院区CMI指数以评价其应用效果。结果:WI-DRGs费用RIV为0.596,CV为0.10-0.54,平均住院日RIV为0.389,CV为0.02-0.22。WI-DRGs在妇婴疾病分组方面较优。结论:WI-DRGs组间异质性和组内同质性较好,具有较好的实用性,在控制费用增长,优化费用结构,尤其是提升妇幼卫生经费使用效率方面具有较广泛的应用前景。Objective:To discuss the grouping effect and application evaluation of Women Infant-Diagnosis-RelatedGroups(WI-DRGs) model.Methods:The homogeneity within groups and heterogeneity among groups of WI-DRGs were evaluated.The grouping effects of WI-DRGs, CN-DRGs, MS-DRGs and AR-DRGs were compared. The CMI of three districts were compared toverify the application effects.Results:The cost RIV and CV of WI-DRGs were 0.596 and 0.10-0.54, length of stay RIV and CV were0.389 and 0.02-0.22. WI-DRGs were the preferred in grouping of wemen's and infants' disease.Conclusion:The heterogeneityamong groups and the homogeneity within groups were sound in the WI-DRGs system. WI-DRGs could be applied comprehensivelyin controlling the cost growth, optimizing cost structure, especially had extensive application prospect of promoting the usage efficiencyof maternal and child healthcare expenditure.
分 类 号:R1[医药卫生—公共卫生与预防医学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.21.125.27