检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《实用癌症杂志》2016年第5期769-771,共3页The Practical Journal of Cancer
摘 要:目的观察MVP方案新辅助化疗治疗ⅢA期非小细胞肺癌的疗效。方法选择80例ⅢA期非小细胞肺癌患者作为研究对象,将术前采用MVP方案进行新辅助化疗的患者设为观察组,直接进行手术治疗的患者设为对照组,2组各40例。对2组近期疗效、并发症发生率及1、3、5年生存率进行对比。结果观察组总有效率为77.5%,对照组总有效率为55.0%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。2组患者并发症发生情况无统计学差异(P>0.05)。在生存率方面,2组患者1年生存率无统计学差异(P>0.05),但观察组3年生存率及5年生存率明显高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论MVP方案新辅助化疗可提高临床疗效而不增加术后并发症,且能延长患者生存期,值得临床推广应用。Objective To observe the clinical efficacy of the neo-adjuvant chemotherapy with MVP method for stage ⅢA non-small lung cancer. Methods Clinical data of 80 patients with ⅢA stage non-small lung cancer were analyzed retrospectively. The patients underwent neo-adjuvant chemotherapy with MVP method were collected as the observation group,and the patients underwent surgery without chemotherapy were collected as the control group,each group had 40 cases. Then the efficacy,complications and 1-,3- and 5-year survival rate of the 2 groups were compared. Results The total efficacy of the observation group was 77. 5%,which was obviously higher than that of the control group,55. 0%( P〈0. 05). There were no statistically different between the 2 groups in the incidence of complication( P〉0. 05). 1-year survival rate of the 2 groups had no statistical difference( P〉0. 05),but 3- and 5-year survival rate of the observation group were higher than those of the control group( P〈0. 05). Conclusion Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy with MVP method for stage Ⅲ A non-small cell lung cancer can improve the clinical efficacy and survival with less complications,it is worthy of clinical application.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.222.188.218