检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]沈阳师范大学学前与初等教育学院,沈阳110034 [2]辽宁石油化工大学石油与天然气工程学院,辽宁抚顺113001
出 处:《中国心理卫生杂志》2016年第5期384-388,共5页Chinese Mental Health Journal
基 金:教育部人文社会科学青年基金项目(15YJC190010);辽宁省教育科学"十二五"规划2015年度立项课题(JG15DB011);沈阳师范大学校内资助课题(L201515)
摘 要:目的:探究不同冲动水平男性大学生对面孔表情的注意偏向特点。方法:选取男大学生161人,根据Barratt冲动性量表-11(BIS-11)总分,按前后各16%的比例选出高冲动组和低冲动组各25人进行行为实验。行为实验以高兴、愤怒和中性面孔表情图片为线索,采用线索-靶子任务来考察注意偏向。结果:线索-靶子任务的反应时结果显示,冲动性、线索和面孔表情三重交互作用有统计学意义(P=0.011),高冲动组在有效线索条件下,高兴表情比愤怒表情和中性表情反应时更快[(346.17±10.71)ms vs.(351.36±11.53)ms,(351.45±11.31)ms];在无效线索条件下,高兴表情比中性表情反应时更慢[(380.91±12.91)ms vs.(374.78±12.32)ms],与愤怒表情反应时[(378.73±11.33)ms]差异无统计学意义。低冲动组在有效和无效两种条件下均显示,高兴表情比中性表情反应时更快[(349.60±9.01)ms vs.(355.17±9.88)ms],与愤怒表情反应时[(351.83±9.33)ms]差异无统计学意义。结论:高冲动和低冲动男大学生均对高兴表情存在注意偏向,但是高冲动男大学生比低冲动男大学生更难从注意中解脱出来。Objective: To explore the characteristics of attentional bias in male college students with different level of impulsivity. Methods: According to the scores of Barratt Impulsiveness Scale-11 (BIS-11), 50 students were selected from 161 male college students and divided into higher impulsivity group (with top 16% BIS- 11 scores, n = 25) and lower impulsivity group (with bottom 16% BIS-11 scores, n = 25). Present study utilized a cue-target task, in which were set three different facial expressions ( happy, angry and neutral) as clue. Results: There was a significant three factors interaction effect among impulsivity, facial expression and cue (P = 0. 011) in the results of response times. In valid trials, higher impulsivity group had shorter reaction time to happy facial ex- pression than to angry and neutral facial expression [(346. 17 ± 10. 71) ms vs. (351.36 ± 11.53) ms, (351.45± 11.31) ms]. In invalid trials, their reaction times to happy facial expression [(380. 91 ± 12. 91) ms] were lon- ger than those to neutral facial expression [(374. 78 ± 12. 32) ms] and did not differ from those to angry facial ex- pression [(378.73 ± 11.33) ms]. For lower impulsivity group, in both valid and invalid trials, the reaction times to happy facial expression [ (349.60 ± 9. 01) ms] were shorter than those to neutral facial expression [ (355.17 ±9. 88) ms], while not different from those to angry facial expression [ (351.83± 9. 33) ms]. Conclusion: It sug- gests that both higher impulsivity and lower impulsivity male college students show attentional bias on happy expression, and the high mpulsivity ones have more attentional avoidance than lower impulsivity ones.
分 类 号:B844.2[哲学宗教—发展与教育心理学] B842.2[哲学宗教—心理学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229