生态犯罪治理刑事和解模式的困境与出路——以福建生态犯罪“补植复绿”司法实践为例  

The Trouble and Solution of the Mode of Ecological Crime Criminal Reconciliation——Take Fujian Judicial Practice as an Example

作　　者：白晓东[1] 李兰英[2] 

机构地区：[1]华侨大学法学院 [2]厦门大学法学院

出　　处：《华侨大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2016年第2期102-110,共9页Journal of Huaqiao University(Philosophy & Social Sciences)

基　　金：福建省社会科学规划项目"生态犯罪治理补偿修复实践之制度规范与理论创新研究"(2014B232)

摘　　要：福建地区生态犯罪司法裁判的"补植复绿"实践,是一种刑事和解制度适用典型示例,但是,这种实践并没有实体法根据,常常引起理论质疑。基于刑事和解制度价值,有必要依托刑法,在刑法总则中规定补偿、恢复等刑事和解措施,完善刑罚制度、创设替代性措施和刑罚易科制度;在分则中创设生态犯罪处罚阻却事由,以便"补植复绿"等刑事和解措施的适用有法可循。The ＂replanting plant＂ practice by Fujian regional ecological criminal judicial judgment is a kind of criminal re- conciliation system. This practice is not based on legal basis but on the value of criminal reconciliation system, and often causes a theoretical question. It is necessary to stipulate the criminal reconciliation system, optimize the system of punish- ment, create the alternative measures and establish the exchanged penalty system, which rely on the criminal law. To cre- ate ecological crime punishment deterrent for specific provisions of criminal law is likely to achieve the executable objective.

关 键 词：刑事和解 补植复绿 刑罚替代措施 易科刑罚 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]