专利权保护网之漏洞及其弥补手段研究  

On the Loophole in the Network of Patent Protection and the Method to Fix

作　　者：董涛[1] 

机构地区：[1]国家知识产权局知识产权发展研究中心,北京100088

出　　处：《现代法学》2016年第2期43-60,共18页Modern Law Science

摘　　要：与商标、版权不同,中国专利权保护网至今仍然存在较大的漏洞。导致漏洞的原因主要在于对专利侵权行为行政执法权与刑事责任的缺失。一些理论认为侵害商标、版权等行为会对消费者造成损害,这涉及到社会公共利益问题,所以纳入刑法保护范围、动用秩序行政的手段予以制裁是可以接受的;专利作为私人财产权,其侵害行为应当归于民事纠纷范畴,权利人遭遇侵害时只能自行通过民事诉讼的方式进行救济,侵权人不应承担刑事责任,国家也不能动用秩序行政的方式进行保护。这可以从创新驱动发展下专利保护面临的严峻现实、导致专利保护严峻现实的理论误解、专利民事司法救济在构建创新秩序方面的局限性来展开论述。强化并规范专利行政执法,及时将专利侵权行为纳入刑法保护范围,是弥补专利权保护网上巨大漏洞的两个重要手段。在建设创新型国家的大背景下,不仅是正当的,而且是迫切的。Due to lack of administrative enforcement of patent law to restrain patent infringement activities, and criminal liability to the infringers, there＇ s a big loophole in patent protection network compare to trademark and copyright pro ment of patent is tection in China, where the innovators＇ profit leaks out. Many scholars hold that the infringeessentially private business and should be settled through civil litigation procedure only, which different from the infringement cases of trademark and copyright. These latter cases will cause confusion to consumers and damage public interest, so the interference of administrative enforcement of law and impose of criminal liability are reasonable and legitimated. This paper reflects from several perspectives, to prove under the mission of building innovative country, the intensification of administrative enforcement of patent law, which will be under the rigorous judiciary surveillance at the same time, and incorporation of patent infringement into penal code, are not only necessary, but urgent.

关 键 词：专利保护网 漏洞 弥补手段 行政执法 刑法保护 

分 类 号：DF523.2[政治法律—民商法学]