检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]广西医科大学第四附属医院暨柳州市工人医院口腔科,柳州545005
出 处:《右江医学》2016年第2期187-190,共4页Chinese Youjiang Medical Journal
摘 要:目的探讨一次性根管治疗在残髓炎治疗中的近期临床效果,评价临床可行性。方法选取临床诊断为残髓炎的患牙94颗,随机分为两组,实验组采用一次性根管治疗术,对照组采用多次性根管治疗术,观察根管治疗术后一周疼痛发生情况及根充后一年成功率。结果两组患牙在根管治疗后一周疼痛反应情况及根充后一年成功率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论在残髓炎治疗中,在熟悉患牙的解剖形态及变异情况的前提下,遵守操作规程,严格无菌操作,一次性根管治疗术具有可行性,且与常规的多次性根管治疗术在近期疗效上无显著性差异。Objective To investigate short-term clinical effect of single-visit root canal therapy for residual pulpitis, so as to evaluate clinical feasibility.Methods 94 teeth diagnosed with residual pulpitis were selected and randomly divided into experimental group and control group.The experimental group were given single-visit root canal therapy, and the control group were given multiple-visit root canal treatment.Then, incidence of pain after root canal therapy and the success rate one year af- ter root filling were observed between groups.Results There was no statistically significant difference in the pain response of the two groups after one week of root canal treatment and in the success rate after root filling one year(P〉0.05).Conclusion In the treatment of residual arthritis, single-visit root canal therapy is feasible under the premise of familiar with the anatomy of the teeth and the variation of the situation, complying with the operating procedures, and strictly adhering to aseptic operation.In addition, the single-visit root canal therapy and conventional root canal treatment has no significant difference in efficacy.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.216.82.12