检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国人民解放军北京军区总医院,北京100700
出 处:《中国药业》2016年第8期82-85,共4页China Pharmaceuticals
摘 要:目的规范医院处方点评工作,提高合理用药水平。方法通过处方点评,分析存在或潜在的用药问题并提出整改意见。结果医院处方点评存在的问题:处方点评方法过于简单;药师审核处方存在局限性;不合理处方判定标准模糊;处方点评制度不够完善。结论处方点评应从工作流程各环节全面入手,加大药师对处方干预的力度,改变将处方审核置于处方流程末端的做法,完善计算机系统和处方点评制度,建立长效监管机制,促进临床合理用药。Objective To standardize the hospital's comments on prescriptions to improve the level of rational drug use. Methods Through comments on prescription,the existing or potential drug problem could be found and opinions could be put forward for rectifi- cation. Results The existing problems of comments on the prescriptions: prescription comment methods were too simple;pharmacists had limitations in reviewing the unreasonable prescription; prescription criteria were fuzzy; prescription review system was not perfect, etc. Conclusion The comments on prescription should start in various aspects of comprehensive workflow, increase pharmacists' efforts on prescription intervention, change the prescription comment process,perfect the computer system,further improve the system of cooments on prescription,establish long- term regulatory mechanism,to promote clinical rational drug use.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222