检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李锋[1]
出 处:《华中科技大学学报(社会科学版)》2016年第3期13-18,46,共7页Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology(Social Science Edition)
摘 要:作为20世纪反乌托邦小说的三大代表作,《我们》、《美丽新世界》、《一九八四》都对各自故事中的专制社会进行了辛辣的讽喻和批判。本文分别以泰勒主义、福特主义、管理型社会为视角,对这三部作品中的社会类型和权力机制进行了系统分析,以期挖掘出其中深刻的政治文化内涵。研究认为,三部作品中的极权主义政府通过各自复杂而精细的社会权力机制,有效地实现了控制国民思想、维持社会现状的目的;在其作者看来,只有最大程度的限制政府的职能范围,才能保证公民拥有足够自由的选择,避免走上通往奴役之路。As the three most critically acclaimed dystopian novels in the 20th century, We, Brave New World and Nineteen Eighty - Four are biting satires of political despotism. The paper aims to make a detailed analysis of their respective social patterns and power mechanisms from the perspectives of Taylorism, Fordism, and Managerial Society. The purpose is to explore the political and cultural implications therein. The study ar- gues that the totalitarian governments in the three novels attempt to control their citizens and maintain the sta- tus quo through their intricate power mechanisms, and the authors share the assumption that the only way to ensure the citizens' freedom to choose and to keep them away from the road to serfdom is to impose strict lim- its on government ' s extent of now,~r
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222