检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《实用医技杂志》2016年第5期466-468,共3页Journal of Practical Medical Techniques
摘 要:目的比较超声造影(CEUS)与磁共振成像(CEMRI)在肝内局灶性病变(FLL)中的价值,并分析导致2种方法误诊的原因。方法回顾性分析189例肝脏局灶性病变患者共220个病灶的超声造影及增强磁共振成像(MRI)检查图像,比较2种方法诊断肝内局灶性病变的准确性。结果超声造影诊断肝内局灶性病变的准确率为89.5%,增强MRI诊断准确率为93.2%,二者比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 CEUS在诊断常见FLL有重要的价值,与增强MRI价值相当。Objective To compare the diagnostic values of contrast-enhanced ultrasound(CEUS)and contrastenhanced magnetic resonance imagmg(CEMRI) for focal liver lesion. Methods The contrast-enhanced ultrasound and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imagmg images were retrospectively analyzed in 189 patients with 220 focal liver lesions,and were compared their accuracies for the diagnosis of focal liver lesion. Results The coincidence rate of contrast-enhanced ultrasound was 89.5% and was 93.2% of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imagmg,showing no significant difference(P〈0.05). Conclusion Contrast-enhanced ultrasound has a great value to the diagnosis of focal liver lesion,as valuable as contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imagmg.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.22.41.47