庭前会议非法证据排除的困境与对策  

The Dilemma and Countermeasures of Exclusion of Illegal Evidence in Pretrial Conference

作　　者：李军[1] 

机构地区：[1]安徽大学法学院,安徽合肥230601

出　　处：《怀化学院学报》2016年第4期75-78,共4页Journal of Huaihua University

摘　　要：庭前会议非法证据排除的制度目的是有效阻止缺乏证据能力的证据流入正式庭审,影响庭审的公正与效率。但司法实践中该制度难以发挥其应有的作用,法院在庭前会议中对非法证据排除申请的处理方式过于简单,无法形成有约束力的会议决议,庭前会议本身也缺乏制度激励。为及早排除非法证据,保障正式庭审公正高效,应对庭前会议进行诉讼化改造,赋予庭前会议决议有拘束控辩双方的效力,建立失权效制度并在二审中提供司法审查途径。The purpose of exclusion of illegal evidence in pretrial conference is to prevent effectively evidence which is lack of evidence ability and will make the trial unfair and ineffective from going into the trial.But in practice,it＇s difficult for the system to fulfill its mission.The way the court handles the exclusion application of illegal evidence in pretrial conference is so simple and unable to make binding conference decision.The pretrial conference itself is also lack of institutional!incentives.In order to exclude illegal evidence as soon as possible and ensure fair and effective criminal trial,we should reform the pretrial conference by following the concept of litigation,making the pretrial conference decision on the part of both the prosecuting and defending parties,improving the system of effect of rights loss and providing judicial review in the second instance.

关 键 词：庭前会议 非法证据排除 制度完善 

分 类 号：DF73[政治法律—诉讼法学]