检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:高景柱[1]
机构地区:[1]天津师范大学,天津300387
出 处:《云南大学学报(社会科学版)》2016年第3期61-69,112,共9页The Journal of Yunnan University:Social Sciences Edition
基 金:国家社会科学基金青年项目"当代西方政治哲学中的全球正义理论跟踪研究"(项目号:14CZZ004);天津市"青年拔尖人才支持计划"的阶段性研究成果
摘 要:平等的福利主义分析进路是当代政治哲学与道德哲学中的平等观的重要分析路径之一,理查德·阿内逊的"福利机遇的平等理论"是其中的一种代表性理论。阿内逊在批判以约翰·罗尔斯与罗纳德·德沃金等人的平等观为典范的平等的资源主义分析路径的基础之上,建构了福利机遇的平等理论,以进一步挽救、修正或发展平等的福利主义分析路径。然而,阿内逊的尝试面临着不少困境,以至于他有放弃平等理念的嫌疑,比如阿内逊对合理偏好的界定存在模糊性,同时,在多元主义社会中,福利并不像阿内逊所反复申述的那样,是唯一具有内在价值以及重要性的东西。The analytic approach of welfarism to equality is an important aspect of the concept of equality in contemporary political philosophy and moral philosophy,and Richard Arneson's equal opportunity for welfare is one of the representative theories. With a criticism of the relevant theories by such scholars as John Rawls and Ronald Dworkin,Richard Arneson establishes his theory of equal opportunity for welfare in order to save,modify or develop the analytic approach of welfarism to equality. However,Richard Arneson has met quite a few difficulties and might give up his endeavors because his definition of reasonable preference has much ambiguity. In fact,in a pluralist society,welfare is not the only important thing with intrinsic value as stressed frequently by Richard Arneson.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222