明人内阁性质观点述评  

A Review of the Nature of the Ming People's Cabinet

作　　者：李宜春[1] 李羽千 

机构地区：[1]宁波工程学院中国东海研究院,浙江宁波315211 [2]武昌理工学院商学院,湖北武汉420115

出　　处：《长江大学学报（社会科学版）》2016年第4期77-82,共6页Journal of Yangtze University（Social Sciences Edition）

基　　金：宁波市社科规划基金项目(JD15JC)

摘　　要：由于朱元璋对外朝和内辅领袖的猜忌,明朝内阁始终没有从制度层面被明确为像以前朝代那样普遍存在的具有政务统筹、内辅作用的机构;而行政体系运行的惯性又要求有一个这样的机构存在。明代朝野对于内阁的指责,既有不尊祖制、越位,又有缺位、不作为。而明朝人士关于阁臣"只备论顾问之职,原非宰相"与"虽无相名,实有相职"的矛盾性论断,恰恰反映出内阁地位的尴尬和明朝中枢制度设计的缺陷。Due to Zhu Yuanzhang＇s suspicion on external and inner auxiliary leader,the cabinet of the Ming Dynasty has not been clearly defined as institutions of a government co-ordination and internal auxiliary from the system level,as common as the previous dynasties.And the inertia of the administrative system is also required to have such a mechanism exists.The Ming Dynasty＇s blame on cabinet for not only do not respect the ancestors＇ system,offside,and there are vacancy and inaction.And the Ming people on the cabinet minister＇s contradictory statements,such an＂only on a consultant,is not prime minister＂and＂although there is no prime minister＇s name,but there has the prime minister＇s position＂,precisely reflecting the status of the cabinet and the defects of the central system design in the Ming Dynasty.

关 键 词：内阁 大学士 宰相 内辅 

分 类 号：K248[历史地理—历史学]