检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:林堃[1] 姚瑶[1] 黄浩杰[1] 蒋斐[1] 金震东[1] 李兆申[1]
机构地区:[1]第二军医大学长海医院消化内科,上海200433
出 处:《中国实用内科杂志》2016年第6期479-481,共3页Chinese Journal of Practical Internal Medicine
基 金:国家自然科学基金(81300353)
摘 要:目的 探究超声内镜引导下无水乙醇灌洗术(EUS-EL)治疗胰腺浆液性囊性肿瘤的临床疗效及安全性。方法回顾性分析第二军医大学长海医院消化内科2012年5月至2014年11月期间收治的13例胰腺浆液性囊性肿瘤患者的临床资料,其中6例接受超声内镜引导下无水乙醇灌洗术治疗及术后随访,另7例仅接受超声内镜引导下囊液抽吸术,进行为期7~36个月的随访。对两组患者临床症状、病灶大小的变化及复发率进行了比较,统计手术相关并发症的情况。结果 EUS-EL治疗组在治疗前后囊肿最大直径分别为(24.8±14.2)mm及(9.0±4.8)mm(P=0.004)。对照组在治疗前后囊肿最大直径分别为(21.3±11.6)mm及(18.6±14.0)mm(P=0.203)。EUS-EL治疗组和对照组的囊肿最大直径的变化分别为-15.8±3.1mm和-2.7±1.9mm(P=0.003)。EUS-EL治疗组无相关并发症发生,也无复发病例。治疗组囊肿完全消除4例,对照组完全消除1例。治疗组5例患者腹痛症状缓解,腹痛缓解1例(P=0.11)。结论 接受EUS-EL治疗胰腺浆液性囊性肿瘤可有效缓解临床症状、减小病灶大小,并发症少,安全性较高。Objective To introduce a novel clinical treatment of endoscopic ultrasound-guided ethanol lavage (EUS-EL) sessions for ablation of serous cystic neoplasms(SCN) and evaluate its safety and effectiveness. Methods Retrospective review was performed in 13 patients who had been diagnosed with SCN by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) between May 2012 and November 2014 in Changhai Hospital, China. Six patients who accepted EUS-EL were divided into EUS-EL group and the other seven who merely received EUS-FNA were classified as control group. Final analysis was performed after 7-36 months of follow- up. Results The mean maximum cyst diameter of EUS-EL group before and after treatments were (24.8±5.8)mm and (9.0±4.8)mm (P= 0.004), while the mean maximum cyst diameter of control group before and after treatments were (21.3±11.6)mm and (18.6±14.0) mm (P=0.203), and the variation of mean maximum cyst diameter of EUS-EL group and control group was (-15.8±3.1)mm, (-2.7±1.9) mm (P= 0.003), respectively. The procedure related complications and recurrence rate of EUS-EL group was 0 (0/6). The complete cyst resolution rate of both groups was 66.7% and 14.3% (P=0.086). Abdominal pain was improved in 5 members of EUS-EL group (5/5,100.0%) and only 1of 3 patients in control group got pain improved (33.3%). Conclusion Our preliminary experience with EUS-EL shows a potential role for ablation in treating SCN in China, as a safe and efficient approach to treat selected patients, with high rates of complete resolution and pain release, and low rates of complication and recurrence.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15