检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:童婷婷[1] 姜政[1] 刘畅[1] 曹国栋[1] 胡丹[1]
机构地区:[1]重庆医科大学附属第一医院消化内科,400016
出 处:《重庆医学》2016年第15期2095-2099,共5页Chongqing medicine
摘 要:目的对以雷贝拉唑为基础的三联疗法根治幽门螺杆菌(H.pylori)感染7、10、14d疗效进行Meta分析,以客观评价其疗效。方法计算机检索维普数据库、万方数据库、中国知网数据库(CNKI)、PubMed数据库,查找以雷贝拉唑为基础的不同疗程三联疗法治疗H.pylori感染的相关文献,运用Review Manager5.2软件对文献数据进行分析。结果以雷贝拉唑为基础的三联疗法在H.pylori根除率方面,10d和14d疗程效果优于7d疗程,差异具有统计学意义(7dvs.10dOR=0.72,95%CI:0.53-0.96,P=0.030;7dvs.14dOR=0.49,95%CI:0.31-0.79,P=0.003),但10d和14d疗程差异无统计学意义(OR=0.79,95%CI:0.47-1.34,P=0.390);在不良反应发生率方面,7、10、14d3个疗程分别两两组间对比,差异均无统计学意义(7d vs.10dOR=1.05,95%CI:0.75-1.47,P=0.780;7dvs.14dOR=0.80,95%CI:0.32-2.00,P=0.630;10dvs.14dOR=0.82,95%CI:0.45-1.50,P=0.530);在临床症状缓解率方面,上述各组间对比亦无统计学证据支持何种疗程更加有效(7dvs.10d;OR=0.79,95%CI:0.31-2.04,P=0.630;7dvs.14d:OR=0.72,95%CI:0.26-2.00,P=0.530;10dvs.14d:OR=0.92,95%CI:0.32-2.63,P=0.870)。结论在以雷贝拉唑为基础的三联疗法治疗H.pylori感染时,结合患者经济负担及依从性考虑,建议用药10d则可达到治疗目的。Objective To objectively evaluate the efficacy of rabeprazole-based triple therapy for the treatment of H.pylori infection with different courses including 7days,10 days,and 14 days.Methods Databases of VIP database,Wanfang database,CNKI,PubMed were searched for the related literature on rabeprazole-based triple therapy treating H.pylori infection in different courses.The useful data was analyzed by statistical software Review Manager 5.2.Results With rabepaazole-based triple therapy,the H.pylori eradication rates were higher in 10-day-course and 14-day-course than in 7-day-course(7dvs.10dOR=0.72,95%CI:0.53-0.96,P=0.030;7dvs.14dOR=0.49,95%CI:0.31-0.79,P=0.003).However,there was no statistical significance between 10-day-course and 14-day-course(OR=0.79,95%CI:0.47-1.34,P=0.390).In addition,we had compared the incidence of adverse reactions between the groups of 7-day-course,10-day-course,and 14-day-course,and it revealed that there were no significant differences between them(7dvs.10dOR=1.05,95%CI:0.75-1.47,P=0.780;7dvs.14dOR=0.80,95%CI:0.32-2.00,P=0.630;10dvs.14dOR=0.82,95%CI:0.45-1.50,P=0.530).Similarly,as for the clinical manifestation remission rates,we also found there were no statistical evidences to indicate which kind of treatment was more effective among the three courses stated above(7dvs.10dOR=0.79,95%CI:0.31-2.04,P=0.630;7dvs.14d:OR=0.72,95%CI:0.26-2.00,P=0.530;10dvs.14d:OR=0.92,95%CI:0.32-2.63,P=0.870).Conclusion When rabeprazole-based triple therapy was selected for the treatment of H.pylori infection,the 10-day-course treatment might be a better choice considering about the economic burden and medication adherence of patients.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3