检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]四平市中心人民医院普外科,吉林四平136000
出 处:《中国卫生标准管理》2016年第7期63-64,共2页China Health Standard Management
摘 要:目的探讨传统气腹与免气腹腹腔镜阑尾切除术的临床效果对比。方法按照治疗方式的不同将88例阑尾炎患者分为对照组与观察组,各44例,分别采用传统气腹与免气腹腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗,对比两组疗效。结果观察组术后肠道功能恢复时间及并发症发生率均优于对照组(P<0.05)。结论采用免气腹腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗阑尾炎效果显著,并发症少。Objective To investigate the clinical effectof gasless laparoscopic appendectomy and traditional pneumoperitoneum. Methods According to the different treatment modalities,88 cases of patients with appendicitis were divided into control group and observation group,44 cases in each,respectively,using traditional pneumoperitoneum and gasless laparoscopic appendectomy in the treatment,the curative effects were compared between two groups. Results Postoperative intestinal function recovery time and complication rate of observation group were significantly better than that of control group(P 〈 0.05).Conclusion The gasless laparoscopic appendectomy surgery for appendicitis effect significantly,fewer complications,with clinical value.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.228