刍议案件请示制度  

Discussion on case referrals system

作　　者：王新房 高蕴嶙 

机构地区：[1]江苏省盐城市中级人民法院,江苏224005 [2]重庆市南岸区人民检察院,重庆400060

出　　处：《辽宁公安司法管理干部学院学报》2016年第2期60-62,共3页Journal of Liaoning Administrators College of Police and Justice

摘　　要：案件请示制度的存废之争历来已久。废除论者认为,案件请示制度不仅侵犯了当事人的上诉权,而且不利于发挥法官的独立意识、损害审判效率,甚至会侵犯下级法院的审判独立和直接审理,应将其纳入诉讼的轨道,以便取消案件请示的做法。但案件请示制度在中国的司法土壤中有供其生长的营养元素,并且案件请示制度也有其存在的自身价值。司法实践中应当进一步规范案件请示制度,为我国的司法事业服务,而不是一味为了迎合"司法现代化"而"杀之为快"。Abolition of case referrals system has always been struggled for a long time.Commentators have said that the case referrals system not only violate the right to appeal of the parties, but also go against playing the sense of independence of judges and damage the efficiency of trials, and even violate the independent judgment and direct rehearing of the lower court, which should be included in the track of the proceedings,in order to cancel case referrals practices.But the case referrals system has nutrients for its growth in China＇s judicial system, and also has its own value. The case referrals system should be further standardized in the judicial practice to serve the cause of justice,rather than to ＂kill as fast＂ to cater to the ＂modernization of justice＂.

关 键 词：案件请示 价值 本土因素 

分 类 号：D925.18[政治法律—诉讼法学]