战略博弈:中美大学教育财政波动态势分析  

Strategic Game: Comparative Study on the Educational Finance Fluctuation between Chinese and American Universities

作　　者：曲绍卫[1] 纪效珲[1] 魏力[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京科技大学教育经济与管理研究所,北京100083

出　　处：《教育与经济》2016年第3期45-50,共6页Education & Economy

基　　金：国家社会科学基金教育学一般课题"我国高校大学生资助管理评估研究"(项目批准号:BFA 150041)阶段性成果

摘　　要：本文以《美国新闻和世界导报》最新公布的大学排名,选取美国著名的80所公立高校与中国教育部直属76所高校进行比较,分析2004-2013财年大学教育财政投入的变化态势,以期深度探讨和审视世界最大的两大经济体在大学财政政策方面的差异性,从大学教育财政的价值取向窥视人力资本竞争的战略博弈。从比较结果来看:美国在经济发展放缓的财政背景下,依然确保大学教育财政的持续增长,是其强化大国国际竞争力的重要举措;我国政府在保证大学财政投入较大比例和持续增幅的情况下,亟待打造大学主体自身市场的融资能力,以降低对政府财政的依存度,激活大学主体财政获取的积极动力,是大学财政改革更待深化的重点场域。Based on the latest rankings released by "US News and World Report", this paper conducted a comparative study between eighty selected renowned American public universities and seventy-six Chinese universities which were managed directly under the Ministry of Education. By exploring the dynamic financial investment trend of university education, the research examined the differences between the two largest economies in the university fiscal policy and financial value orientation so as to conclude two countries’strategies in the fierce human capital competition. The results showed that in the United States where economic growth slowed, it still endeavored to ensure the ongoing growth of university education finance, which was an important measure taken to enhance its the international competitiveness;As for China, where the government need to maintain university financial investment as high as increasing to create universities’ ability to raise capital from the market and to reduce the financial dependence on the government. Therefore, to activate universities’motivation to gain education finance and improve the ability of multi-channel financing are the key two fields for the university financial reform.

关 键 词：后金融危机时代 中美大学教育财政 借鉴与启迪 

分 类 号：F08[经济管理—政治经济学] G40-054[文化科学—教育学原理]