检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《河北经贸大学学报(综合版)》2016年第2期75-78,共4页Journal of Hebei University of Economics and Business(Comprehensive Edition)
基 金:2012年度司法部"国家法治与法学理论研究项目"(12SFB1002)
摘 要:面对我国司法资源越发紧缺的情况,节约司法成本,有效地优化程序成为迫切需要。英美法系在庭审前注重对案件进行分流处理,使得大部分简易案件庭审和解解决。案件分流机制能够更有效地利用有限的司法资源集中力量解决复杂的案件问题。在进一步明确案件分流标准、保证当事人的程序选择权和完善制度设计等方面采取一定措施。为避免片面追求效率和节约司法成本。For lack of judicial resources,saving judicial costs and optimizing judicial procedure have become urgent needs for China.British and American legal systems lay emphasis on case distribution,with which most simple cases can be settled in court.This paper clearly states that case distribution mechanism can effectively utilize limited judicial resources to focus on complex cases and at the same time.It also puts forwards to take effective measures in defining the standard of case distribution,assuring the litigant's selective right in procedure and perfecting system design so as to lower judicial cost and avoid excessive pursuit of efficiency.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222