论“审判中心主义”下的审前程序控制——以“隐性超期羁押”为切入点  

On the Controlling of Pretrial Procedure Under the Centralism of Judgment——Taking "Hidden Extended Custody" Point to Cut in

作　　者：杨晓静[1] 周晓武 

机构地区：[1]山东大学法学院,山东济南250100 [2]济南市天桥区人民检察院,山东济南250031

出　　处：《政法论丛》2016年第3期129-136,共8页Journal of Political Science and Law

摘　　要：相较于刑事诉讼中羁押期限届满仍继续羁押的"显性超期羁押",审前程序中侦查、公诉机关随意延长羁押期限、重新计算羁押期限以及不计入羁押期限等的"隐性超期羁押"则一直是理论及实务界的"盲区"。针对司法实践中诸多"隐性超期羁押"的严重侵权隐患,在"审判中心主义"司法改革目标指导下,对我国"隐性超期羁押"审前程序控制的司法改革路径可以分两步走,逐步实现由人民检察院的"准诉讼化"司法审查机制向人民法院主导、控制的"诉讼化"司法审查机制的渐进式改革。Hidden extended custody is always a ＂ blind spots＂ on theory and practice. Compared to the ＂ dominant extended custody＂,which the term over the criminal litigation in detention period. Hidden extended custody refers to the extended custody,which the term of extended custody is not included in the legal terms. Such as the investigation during the pretrial procedure,public prosecution organ extends the detention period casually,and recounts the term of detention. In view of serious infringement risks brought by the hidden extended custody that exists in judicial practice,our country＇s approach of judicial reform to strengthen the controlling of the hidden extended custody in the pretrial procedure can be divided into two steps,under the guidance of the Centralism of Judgement. It aims to realize the transition from Quasi Litigation of judicial review mechanism guided by the People＇s Procuratorate to Llitigation of judicial review mechanism dominated and controlled by the people＇s court gradually.

关 键 词：审判中心主义 隐性超期羁押 审前程序控制 预审法官 

分 类 号：DF718[政治法律—诉讼法学]