“211工程”和“985工程”存废争论究竟争什么——对高校重点建设以及高校身份符号的透析  

What Are the Dispute of the Existence and Abolition of “211” and “985”

作　　者：刘佳[1] 方兴[1] 

机构地区：[1]华东师范大学,上海200062

出　　处：《现代教育管理》2016年第6期20-25,共6页Modern Education Management

基　　金：教育部人文社科规划基金项目"我国高等教育需求中的信息不对称现象研究"(15YJA880050)

摘　　要：有关"211工程"和"985工程"存废的争论涉及工程本身的问题和"211高校"、"985高校"身份符号的问题。通过对高校重点建设和高校身份符号进行透析,发现所谓"211"和"985"存废之争实质是混淆了具体争论对象的大混战,指向的均是"211工程"和"985工程",然而所论述的具体内容却各不相同。争论之所以产生是源于"211工程"和"985工程"暴露出的具体问题日益凸显。基于这些问题,在建设"双一流"的背景下,未来"211工程"和"985工程"的调整之路在于强化一流学科建设,淡化建设中行政主导的力量,在重点建设资金管理与使用上加强法制建设,重视建设过程中的绩效。The debates about the＂211＂and＂985＂include the problems of the project itself and the universities status symbols of＂211 universities＂and＂the 985 universities＂. Through analyzing the key construction and university identity symbols,found that the so-called＂211＂and＂985＂to save or waste problems in the essence are a big melee confusing the specific arguments object. Though they point to the＂211 Project＂and＂985 Project＂,the specific content of the discussion is not the same. The reason why the controversy stems is that the issues of＂211 Project＂and＂985Project＂are becoming increasingly prominent. Based on these problems,in the background of＂double class＂construction,the adjustment road of＂211 Project＂and＂985 Project＂is to strengthen the construction of the first class,and weaken the power of the administrative leadership in the construction of key construction funds management and use to strengthen the legal system,pay attention to the process of building performance in future.

关 键 词：211工程 985工程 重点建设 身份符号 

分 类 号：G640[文化科学—高等教育学]