检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《高校教育管理》2016年第3期42-46,共5页Journal of Higher Education Management
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目(BIA130064);江苏大学高级人才基金(09JDG046)
摘 要:文章通过对10所公立高校内部治理组织形式及作用、内部治理权力形态和分布、大学校长选拔和"去行政化"的现状进行实证调查发现:公立高校内部党政职责界限不清,三级管理效率低下;外部利益相关者参与内部治理的机制缺乏;内部治理机构设置行政化,监督虚无化;内部治理行政权力主导,学术权力式微。完善公立高校内部治理结构,应该从基层学院开始,让学院成为改革的突破口;构建外部利益相关者参与治理的监事会制度;彰显学术权力,重构学术权力和行政权力制衡的内部权力体系;构建高效有序的权力运行机制。Through an empirical survey on forms and function of internal governance organization, power allocation and operation of internal governance, the selection course of University President and the situation of "De administration" in 10 public colleges and universities in China, it is found out that, in public university, the responsibilities line between Party committee and President is unclear, the three--level administration is low in efficiency, the mechanism of external stakeholders engaged in the governance is lack, the internal governance organization follows administrative mode and no inner supervision existed, the inner power allocation was lead by the administrative power instead of aca- demic power. In order to improve the internal governance structure in public universities, reforms should be started from school. Measures should be adopted to establish the board of supervisors to make the external stakeholders engaged, balance the internal power allocation between administration power and academic power, build orderly and efficient power moving mechanism.
分 类 号:G640[文化科学—高等教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222