检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《实用癌症杂志》2016年第6期956-958,共3页The Practical Journal of Cancer
摘 要:目的探讨常规超声联合超声弹性成像在乳腺癌诊断中的应用价值。方法对104例乳腺疾病患者进行常规及弹性成像超声检查,以病理学检查结果为金标准,评估乳腺癌常规超声和弹性成像的准确性、特异性及敏感性。结果常规超声诊断乳腺恶性肿块的敏感性为75.0%(27/36),特异性为86.4%(76/88),准确性为83.1%(103/124);常规超声联合弹性成像诊断乳腺恶性肿瘤的敏感性为80.6%(29/36),特异性为89.8%(79/88),准确性为90.3%(112/124)。常规超声诊断与二者联合应用对乳腺良、恶性病灶诊断的差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论常规超声联合超声弹性成像应用可提高乳腺癌诊断的准确性,可在临床上推广使用。Objective To investigate the value of routine ultrasound combined with ultrasound elastography in the diagnosis of breast cancer. Methods 104 cases of breast disease received conventional ultrasound and elastography,and pathological results were used to evaluate the accuracy,specificity and sensitivity of breast cancer ultrasound and elastography. Results The sensitivity of conventional ultrasound diagnosis for breast malignant tumors was 75. 0%( 27 /36),specificity was 86. 4%( 76 /88),and accuracy was 83. 1%( 103 /124); sensitivity of conventional ultrasound combined with ultrasound elastography in the diagnosis of breast malignant tumors was 80. 6%( 29 /36),specificity was 89. 8%( 79 /88),and accuracy was 90. 3%( 112 /124),There had significant difference in the diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions between the 2 groups( P〈0. 05). Conclusion Routine ultrasound combined with elastography can improve the accuracy of diagnosis of breast cancer,and it can promote the use in clinical practice.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28