检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《海南大学学报(人文社会科学版)》2016年第3期102-107,共6页Journal of Hainan University (Humanities & Social Sciences)
基 金:北京师范大学"中央高校基本科研业务费专项基金"资助(SKZZY2015012)
摘 要:专家辅助人制度在功能承载、制度创设及法理考虑上均值得肯定,但在司法实践中适用的效果并不理想。因此,有必要对司法实践中存在的问题进行分析、反思。通过明确专家辅助人意见的二元法律属性,规范法院对专家辅助人参与诉讼申请的审查,制定专家辅助人的主体资格标准,完善专家辅助人的权利义务设定以及严格规范法院裁判文书的制作来达到充分实现专家辅助人制度价值之目的。While the system of expert assessor certainly wins the positive support in terms of its functional carrier,institutional innovation and legal account,its applicable effects are not ideal in the judicial practice,which makes it necessary to analyze and reflect on those problems. Recognizing the binary legal attributes of the expert assessor's advice,the court is supposed to regulate the review of application participated by the expert assessor,formulate the criteria for the subjective qualification of the expert assessor,improve the setting for the expert assessor's rights and duties,as well as strictly specify the production of the judicial document so as to fully realize the value of the expert assessor system.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28