农村留守儿童与城市儿童主观幸福感之比较  

Subjective Well-being of Rural Left-behind and Urban Children

作　　者：匡仪 吕飒飒 刘枫[1] 王若逸 贺豪振[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国.宁波大学心理学系暨研究所,浙江宁波315211

出　　处：《中国健康心理学杂志》2016年第6期919-922,共4页China Journal of Health Psychology

摘　　要：目的:分析比较农村留守儿童与城市儿童主观幸福感的差异。方法:采用青少年主观幸福感量表对139名儿童进行问卷调查。结果:农村留守儿童的总体生活满意度显著低于城市儿童(F=9.200,P<0.01),农村留守儿童体验到的积极情感显著低于城市儿童(F=5.075,P<0.05);父母一方外出的农村留守儿童的总体生活满意度(t=2.168,P<0.05)、积极情感体验(t=2.05,P<0.05)显著高于父母均外出的留守儿童,父母一方外出的留守儿童体验到的消极情感显著低于父母均外出的留守儿童(t=-2.403,P<0.05)。结论:农村留守儿童与城市儿童主观幸福感均处于中等偏上水平,且存在显著差异;留守类型影响留守儿童的主观幸福感水平。Objective：To explore the difference between the rural left-behind and urban children on subjective well-being（SWB） .Methods：SWB questionnaire of adolescent students were used to investigate 139 children .Results：The total life-satisfaction of rural left-behind children was significantly lower than that of urban children（F=9 2. ,P〈0 0.1） ,the positive feelings of rural left-behind children was significantly lower（F=5 0.75 ,P〈0 0.5）;The SWB and the positive feelings of rural left -behind children whose parents were out unilaterally for jobs were significantly higher than those whose parents were all out（t=2 1.68 ,2 0.5;P〈0 0.5）;The negative feelings of rural left -behind children whose parents were out unilaterally for jobs was significantly lower than those whose parents were all out（t=‐2 4.03 ,P〈0 0.5） .Conclusion：The SWB of the rural left-behind and urban children are both in upper-middle lev‐el ,and there is a significant difference between them .The style of left-behind can affect the SWB of the rural left-behind children .

关 键 词：农村留守儿童 城市儿童 主观幸福感 留守类型 

分 类 号：R395.9[哲学宗教—心理学] B844.1[医药卫生—医学心理学]