主观恶性新界说  

New Theory of Subjective Evil

作　　者：李永升[1] 冯文杰[1] 

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学法学院,重庆401120

出　　处：《河南警察学院学报》2016年第2期78-84,共7页Journal of Henan Police College

基　　金：中央财政支持地方高校建设项目"特殊群体权利保护与犯罪预防研究创新团队"的研究成果;西南政法大学法学院2015级研究生科研创新项目"主观恶性新界说"的研究成果;"西南政法大学科研创新项目"(FXYYB2015125)的研究成果

摘　　要：近现代刑法学的发展史是一部苦苦追寻贯通犯罪与刑罚合理联系的探寻史,行为主义刑法学派、行为人主义刑法学派、人格主义刑法学派的界说均存在着或多或少的问题。在静止的犯罪与变化的刑罚之间,必然有一个呈时空变化状的因素方能将二者合理贯通始终,该任务的完成者不是静止着的客观罪行,也不是静止着的主观罪过,更不是隶属于心理学概念上的虚无缥缈的人格态度,以对社会化的维持及其良性发展的蔑视与对抗态度作为自身内核的主观恶性成为当仁不让的中介载体。这个主观恶性坚持由行为作为其征表的可靠载体,犯罪行为成为其进入刑法学评价范围的绝对牵引力,而罪前、罪后可以表明犯罪人主观恶性轻重程度的因素也依附于主观恶性进入刑法学的评价范围。The history of the development of modern criminal law is a quest to explore the reasonable relations between crime and punishment. Behaviorism criminal law school, actor criminal law school and personalism crimi- nal law school have their own problems respectively. Between stationary crime and changing punishment there must be a factor of time and space which can reasonably balance the both. This factor can not be either the still signifi- cant objective crime or stationary subjective guilt, or even the personalism belonging to the illusory psychology con- cept. Subjective evil, with its contempt and confrontation attitude for social maintenance and healthy development, can be this factor. The subjective evil manifests with behaviors and can be evaluated with criminal＇ s before-crime and after- crime attitude.

关 键 词：刑法学派 主观恶性 主观罪过 人身危险性 社会危害性 

分 类 号：D924[政治法律—刑法学]