出 处:《中华医学杂志》2016年第24期1896-1902,共7页National Medical Journal of China
基 金:十二五国家科技支撑计划课题(2012BA106802)
摘 要:目的应用氢气结合甲烷乳果糖呼气试验(LBT)研究腹泻型肠易激综合征(IBS-D)患者中小肠细菌过度生长(SIBO)的发生率和临床特征,并初步探讨利福昔明对IBS-D患者的疗效。方法纳入2015年3月至2016年1月就诊于北医三院消化科门诊符合罗马Ⅲ标准的IBS-D患者和年龄、性别相匹配的健康志愿者,应用LBT检测IBS-D患者中SIBO发生率并分析IBS-D合并SIBO(IBS-P组)和不合并SIBO(IBS-N组)患者的临床特征及LBT特点。应用利福昔明(0.4 g,2次/d)对IBS-D患者进行4周治疗,比较治疗前、后不同组患者临床症状和LBT变化。 结果(1)共纳入84例IBS-D患者和22名健康志愿者(对照组),IBS-D中SIBO发生率为41.67%(35/84),其中单纯氢气呼气试验阳性者27例(77.14%),单纯甲烷呼气试验阳性者5例(14.29%),二者均阳性者3例(8.57%)。(2)IBS-P组的体质量指数(BMI)低于IBS-N组[(21.61±0.57)比(23.44±0.54)kg/m2,P〈0.05],最多排便次数少于IBS-N组[ (3.85±0.23)比(4.88±0.35)次/d,P〈0.05]。(3)IBS-P组、IBS-N组和对照组的口盲传输时间差异无统计学意义。IBS-P组小肠段和结肠段呼气中氢气丰度显著高于对照组和IBS-N组,小肠段和结肠段(160 min处)甲烷丰度高于IBS-N组(均P〈0.05)。(4)IBS-P组、IBS-N组和对照组的平均呼气氢气丰度和甲烷丰度无显著线性相关(均r〈0.35,P〉0.05)。(5)IBS-P组接受利福昔明治疗13例,治疗后患者腹痛、腹胀、粪便性状、排便次数和排便不满意度显著好转(均P〈0.05);IBS-N组接受治疗8例,患者粪便性状、排便次数和排便不满意度较治疗前好转(均P〈0.05)。(6)IBS-P组患者利福昔明治疗后LBT转阴率为5/13,各时间点呼气中氢气丰度均下降,结肠段(120 min处)更为显著[(34.54±7.32)×10^-6比(52.23±9.40)×10^-6,P〈0.05];各时间点呼气中甲�ObjectiveTo investigate the prevalence and clinical features of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) in diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-D) patients detected by hydrogen and methane in lactulose breath test (LBT), and to study the effects of rifaximin in IBS-D patients.MethodsConsecutive patients with IBS-D who met Rome Ⅲ criteria, and gender- and age-matched healthy volunteers were enrolled from March 2015 to January 2016 in Peking University Third Hospital. All the ISB-D patients underwent LBT to detect the prevalence of SIBO. The clinical and LBT features of IBS with SIBO (IBS-P group) and without SIBO (IBS-N group) were analyzed. The effects of rifaximin therapy (0.4 g, twice per day for 4 weeks) in IBS-D patients were evaluated by comparing changes in clinical features and LBT results after treatment.Results(1) Eighty-four IBS-D patients and 22 healthy controls were enrolled. The prevalence of SIBO in IBS-D patients was 41.67% (35/84), with 27 (77.14%) only hydrogen-positive, 5 (14.29%) methane-positive, and 3 (8.57%) both methane- and hydrogen-positive. (2) The body mass index (BMI) in the IBS-P group was lower than in the IBS-N group [(21.61±0.57) vs (23.44±0.54) kg/m2,P〈0.05], the maximum stool frequency was also less than in the IBS-N group [(3.85±0.23) vs (4.88±0.35) times/day, P〈0.05]. (3) No significant difference was found in oro-cecal transit time (OCTT) among IBS-P, IBS-N and healthy controls. The hydrogen concentration in small intestinal and colonic sections in breath of the IBS-P group was higher than that of both healthy controls and the IBS-N group, while methane concentration in small intestinal and colonic sections (160 min) was higher than that of the IBS-N group (all P〈0.05). (4) There was no linear relationship between mean hydrogen and methane concentrations in LBT among the IBS-P, the IBS-N and healthy control groups (all r〈0.35, P〉0.05). (5) Totally
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...